Woods, McIlroy bring buzz back to Bethpage Black (The Associated Press)
2012
Joe Girardi chases heckler during postgame press conference (Video)
2012
Joe Girardi got his first taste of major-league media and fans in 1989, when he broke in with the Chicago Cubs as a 24-year-old catcher. That also was the heyday of coach Mike Ditka of the Chicago Bears. Da Coach. Now there was a guy who knew how to conduct a press conference. And when fans would add to the volatile mix and interrupt a Q&A, classic and enduring comedy would result.
So, what happened when Girardi the manager got interrupted Wednesday night by a heckler during a postgame press conference following a tough Yankees loss to the White Sox in Chicago?
A camera crew from CSN Chicago captured some of the heckling. The obnoxious fan, possibly emboldened because he had been imbibing, can be heard saying, "Yankees swept? Yes!" in the style of White Sox broadcaster Hawk Harrelson, as he walked down a wide tunnel less than 50 feet away from the front door of the Yankees clubhouse at U.S. Cellular Field. There, Girardi was going over the game's postmortem with New York's beat reporters. Girardi let the first salvo go as he chatted about a great performance by Chicago's Chris Sale, but when the fan opened his mouth again, Girardi broke the huddle and went after him:
[Related: Three Rays minor leaguers suspended 50 games after testing positive for meth]
"Hey, hey, hey, shut up. We're doing an interview!"
Girardi starts out Ditka-like as he starts chasing the man, but he ends up rebutting without following the interloper out of the stadium. A wise choice. Perhaps he stopped because Girardi mentally consulted The Binder, which lays out every possible scenario for a manager, as we all know.
Further, how deft was it on Girardi's part to return to the media scrum and pick up right where he left off? Never let them see you sweat, skip!
Postgame managerial pow-wows sometimes happen outside of the visitor's clubhouse in Chicago because the manager's office inside is kind of small. Plus, with the crush of media following the Yankees, it makes sense not to crowd everyone. This wasn't a big deal in the past, but the White Sox have changed how they let some fans in and out of the ballpark in recent seasons. People sitting in the pricey area right behind home plate (seats similar to the ones in Yankee Stadium you often see empty because they're too expensive) get their own entrance and exit. And it's close enough to the visitor's clubhouse that confrontations like this are possible.
You figure that the seats behind home plate would price out most of the William Ligue-types or other rowdies who have been known to run on the field and even attack players, coaches and umpires. Still, the Sox might want to add a layer of security by asking the paying customers to show even opponents a little more respect. Even the hated Yankees. It's a good thing, say, Ozzie Guillen wasn't managing the visiting team when something like this happened.
Love baseball? Even like it a little?
Follow @AnswerDave, @bigleaguestew, @KevinKaduk on Twitter,
along with the BLS Facebook page!
More MLB news from Yahoo! Sports:
Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
• How would canceling the Winter Classic impact Detroit and University of Michigan?
• Tyrann Mathieu won't play this year, but will maintain his Twitter profile
• Florida State's Michael Snaer says he's the nation's best shooting guard
• Y! News: Lance Armstrong facing legacy-changing decision as deadline looms in USADA doping case
Lincicome set to open title defense (The Associated Press)
2012
Garcia vague about caddy situation (The Associated Press)
2012
Bjorn to defend Gleneagles title in Scotland (The Associated Press)
2012
NHL rules summit tackling embellishment? Yes, please
2012
Instead of Brendan Shanahan's Research and Development Carnival of Fun this summer, the NHL is doing a small-scale "rules summit" at its headquarters in Toronto; which is a bit like downgrading from Disney's EPCOT to the American Banjo Museum.
This week's summit is laser-focused on the rules currently on the books, as the general opinion is that interference and obstruction crept back into the game last season, and especially in the postseason. (So much for framing obstruction as a way to curb concussions in a red-line-less NHL.)
Indeed, interference penalties alone went from 985 called in 2010-11 to 893 called in 2011-12.
As Colin Campbell told the Canadian Press before the summit:
"Personally, I don't think the hooking and holding has slipped," said Campbell. "I think we have to find out what we want with interference on the forechecking and interference off the faceoff."
The league's former disciplinarian thinks the discussion might branch off to other rules like slashing. "Anything that stops a player from scoring," he said.
Yeah! Ban goalies!
Oh, they mean in a penalty sense. Which is a good starting point, but doesn't address all the officiating ills of the League.
One of those ills is being discussed this week, and it'll be interested to see if anything significant emerges from it … or if the GMs, coaches and players will simply snap their heads back and flail their arms around.
We're of course talking about embellishment.
Via Tim Campbell of the Winnipeg Free Press:
Tuesday's session, which included plenty of video examples, honed in on interference calls and how some of those infractions have crept back into the game after the post-lockout crackdown of 2005. The session also turned its focus to the enforcement of slashing rules and embellishment.
Those items, as well as a broader discussion about where the game stands, will be on today's agenda. Any consensus on those issues is likely to be heard after today's second day of meetings.
Dave Tippett, head coach of the Phoenix Coyotes, took part in the last lockout-centric rules summit — from which revolutionary changes to the NHL's game play emerged — and is participating in this round.
He was a leading voice against embellishment in the Stanley Cup Playoffs last season … which, of course, was a tad ironic given the Triple Lindy his goaltender pulled when Andrew Shaw ran him.
From Pierre LeBrun of ESPN back in May:
"Personally, I've talked about this in a lot of meetings with [GM Don Maloney], our general manager, that the game is turning a little dishonest and it's embellishment by players," Tippett said. "When it's done well, it's very hard for the referees, very hard, because if you fall down near the boards or you drop your stick or you throw your head back, you're putting the referee in a very tough situation."
No doubt Tippett was referring to the dropped stick on Radim Vrbata's slashing penalty late in the game which all but killed any chance for Phoenix to tie it. Kings center Anze Kopitar's stick was knocked loose by Vrbata on the play. Or did Kopitar drop it?
Both Campbell's note from the summit and Tippett's complaint from the postseason point to a specific type of embellishment: Less the head-jerking hysterics on a high stick than the completely deplorable trend in the NHL on slashes. Whether it's the dropped stick or a pair of gloves hurled to the rafters, it's prop comedy to draw a call and, sadly, the gullibility of on-ice officials.
Is there an effective way to police that? Tough to say. Now you're asking officials to make a judgment call about a judgment call, compounded by the fact that there could be an injury on the play.
But in the end, what these rules summits are asking is for referees to be bolder in their officiating. To call ticky-tacky interference penalties again before the game's offense becomes a clogged drain. To not allow hooking and holding just because it's a playoff game.
And, in the case of embellishment, to show some valor in calling out a player who exhibits none in attempting to draw a call.
Slocum hopeful of history repeating itself (The Associated Press)
2012
More at stake than $10 million (The Associated Press)
2012
Former Top-5 Fantasy RB Portis set to retire – Clinton Portis | WAS
2012
Garcia claims 2-stroke win at rainy Wyndham (The Associated Press)
2012

Recent Comments