Golf-Oosthuizen joins parade of major winners for Singapore (Reuters)
2012
Modano tops list of new US Hockey Hall of Famers (Yahoo! Sports)
2012
Modano tops list of new US Hockey Hall of Famers (Yahoo! Sports)
2012
Tour Report: Petrovic moves up money list (PGA Tour)
2012
Tour Report: Big weekend for bubble boys (PGA Tour)
2012
Pats list 14 players questionable for Week 6 – Aaron Hernandez | NE
2012
Brad Marchand better than Tyler Seguin? Chewing on ESPN’s top 25 NHL players under 25
2012
When we last read Neil Greenberg's "Top 25 Players Under 25" list for ESPN.com, he had omitted New York Islanders star John Tavares from the ranking and caused announcer Howie Rose to call him a "housebound agorophobe." Which seems harsh.
Greenberg, a hockey stats analyst, has updated the list on ESPN.com (reg. required); it measures "career-to-date performance in the regular season and the playoffs" through both traditional and advanced stats. It also leaves any player turning 25 before Feb. 1 ineligible, hence no Sidney Crosby or Nicklas Backstrom or Claude Giroux; it also dismisses last year's rookies due to sample size, hence no Gabriel Landeskog, despite his being, you know, Gabriel Landeskog.
Here is Greenberg's Top 25 Under 25 (ESPN Insider), with No. 1 Mr. Toews repeating in that spot:
1. C Jonathan Toews, Chicago Blackhawks, 24
2. C Steven Stamkos, Tampa Bay Lightning, 22
3. C Logan Couture, San Jose Sharks, 23
4. C Jordan Staal, Carolina Hurricanes, 24
5. C John Tavares, New York Islanders, 22
6. RW Patrick Kane, Chicago Blackhawks, 24
7. LW Taylor Hall, Edmonton Oilers, 21
8. D Drew Doughty, Los Angeles Kings,
9. D Erik Karlsson, Ottawa Senators, 22
10. LW Brad Marchand, Boston Bruins, 24
11. D Alex Pietrangelo, St. Louis Blues, 23
12. C Tyler Seguin, Boston Bruins, 21
13. LW Jamie Benn, Dallas Stars, 23
14. LW David Perron, St. Louis Blues, 24
15. RW Jeff Skinner, Carolina Hurricanes, 20
16. D Victor Hedman, Tampa Bay Lightning, 22
17. LW Milan Lucic, Boston Bruins, 24
18. C Sam Gagner, Edmonton Oilers, 23
19. C Evander Kane, Winnipeg Jets, 21
20. D Kevin Shattenkirk, St. Louis Blues, 24
21. C Jordan Eberle, Edmonton Oilers, 22
22. C Patrik Berglund, St. Louis Blues, 24
23. G Semyon Varlamov, Colorado Avalanche, 24
24. D Tyler Myers, Buffalo Sabres, 22
25. LW Wayne Simmonds, Philadelphia Flyers, 24
In the article's comments, Greenberg said that both Ryan McDonough and Oliver Ekman-Larsson didn't have "a large enough track record." Take that as you will. Or, if you're like us, wonder where the [expletive] they are on this list, especially in the case of the latter.
How did Tavares get on the list? How did Marchand rank above his Bruins teammates? Good questions.
The rationale from Greenberg on Tavares:
Regarded by many as an egregious omission on last year's list, Tavares went on to score 21 points (eight goals and 13 assists) over 12 games just days after the list came out, eventually setting career bests in goals (31), assists (50) and points (81). The No. 1 pick in 2009 was always a terrific point producer, but he developed more of a two-way game last season, leading the team in driving puck possession (relative Corsi 10.6) to the point that even a "housebound agraphobe [sic]" couldn't leave him off this list twice.
If that last point was the determining factor for Tavares being either fifth overall or off the list entirely, then it's a specious bit of evidence. Lighthouse Hockey was one of the sites that took on Tavares's snub last season, and spells out the curious Relative Corsi argument:
When dealing with possession numbers like Corsi, one needs to take into account context. What this means is that you can't simply use Corsi without taking into account the situations a player is put in when he's on the ice. Corsi and possession numbers don't measure a player's performance directly - like +/-, they measure the performance of the player's team while the player is on the ice. Thus to truly figure out a player's value, one needs to account for things such as competition and TEAMMATES.
… One standard way of doing this is not to look at standard corsi, but RELATIVE corsi, which compares how a team does with that player ON the ice to how the team does with the player off the ice. And once you do, Tavares stands out as the top player on the Isles (or basically tied with Parenteau). Now this isn't as impressive as it sounds - just as with his scoring, Tavares' extra offensive zone faceoffs mean that his possession numbers by definition are going to be above the team's average or at least should be.
But Tavares' relative corsi is at WORST no less than what we'd expect from an average defender with Tavares' favorable minutes. In fact - while I'm not doing the math right now - these numbers are probably above average., In other words, while Tavares may not be extremely proficient at driving possession, he's more than solid (at worst you can go with average, and that's pushing it given the competition Tavares faces). You can give some other players bonuses for D...but you can't ding Tavares.
Sorry for the gluttonous text block from Lighthouse Hockey, but it serves to add valuable context to Greenberg's argument, which succeeds in explaining why Tavares belongs on the latest list but fails to justify his exclusion previously as anything more than an attention-grabber.
Speaking of which, here's why Brad Marchand is better than Tyler Seguin:
Marchand is a two-way player who logged 17:37 per game for Boston, including 2:09 with the man advantage and 1:23 with the penalty-killing unit, and notched his second straight 20-plus goal season. His most frequent linemates, Selke winner Patrice Bergeron and Tyler Seguin, have been on the ice for more shots at net with Marchand than without him.
Will Seguin be a better player than Marchand in the long run? Of course, even taking into account the Nose Face Killah's intangibles as a pest.
But this ranking is meant to be a snap shot of these players at this moment. The argument here, it seems, is that Marchand's body of work, defensive credentials and (one assumes) stellar postseason in the Bruins' Cup year powers him ahead of Seguin. Along with his bar dancing.
This runs counter to the optics from last season — that Seguin became a star and Marchand regressed from the promise of his playoff run — but it's not an unsound argument given where the players are today.
Now … are either of them that much better than Lucic?
What are your thoughts on the list?
Brad Marchand better than Tyler Seguin? Chewing on ESPN’s top 25 NHL players under 25
2012
When we last read Neil Greenberg's "Top 25 Players Under 25" list for ESPN.com, he had omitted New York Islanders star John Tavares from the ranking and caused announcer Howie Rose to call him a "housebound agorophobe." Which seems harsh.
Greenberg, a hockey stats analyst, has updated the list on ESPN.com (reg. required); it measures "career-to-date performance in the regular season and the playoffs" through both traditional and advanced stats. It also leaves any player turning 25 before Feb. 1 ineligible, hence no Sidney Crosby or Nicklas Backstrom or Claude Giroux; it also dismisses last year's rookies due to sample size, hence no Gabriel Landeskog, despite his being, you know, Gabriel Landeskog.
Here is Greenberg's Top 25 Under 25 (ESPN Insider), with No. 1 Mr. Toews repeating in that spot:
1. C Jonathan Toews, Chicago Blackhawks, 24
2. C Steven Stamkos, Tampa Bay Lightning, 22
3. C Logan Couture, San Jose Sharks, 23
4. C Jordan Staal, Carolina Hurricanes, 24
5. C John Tavares, New York Islanders, 22
6. RW Patrick Kane, Chicago Blackhawks, 24
7. LW Taylor Hall, Edmonton Oilers, 21
8. D Drew Doughty, Los Angeles Kings,
9. D Erik Karlsson, Ottawa Senators, 22
10. LW Brad Marchand, Boston Bruins, 24
11. D Alex Pietrangelo, St. Louis Blues, 23
12. C Tyler Seguin, Boston Bruins, 21
13. LW Jamie Benn, Dallas Stars, 23
14. LW David Perron, St. Louis Blues, 24
15. RW Jeff Skinner, Carolina Hurricanes, 20
16. D Victor Hedman, Tampa Bay Lightning, 22
17. LW Milan Lucic, Boston Bruins, 24
18. C Sam Gagner, Edmonton Oilers, 23
19. C Evander Kane, Winnipeg Jets, 21
20. D Kevin Shattenkirk, St. Louis Blues, 24
21. C Jordan Eberle, Edmonton Oilers, 22
22. C Patrik Berglund, St. Louis Blues, 24
23. G Semyon Varlamov, Colorado Avalanche, 24
24. D Tyler Myers, Buffalo Sabres, 22
25. LW Wayne Simmonds, Philadelphia Flyers, 24
In the article's comments, Greenberg said that both Ryan McDonough and Oliver Ekman-Larsson didn't have "a large enough track record." Take that as you will. Or, if you're like us, wonder where the [expletive] they are on this list, especially in the case of the latter.
How did Tavares get on the list? How did Marchand rank above his Bruins teammates? Good questions.
The rationale from Greenberg on Tavares:
Regarded by many as an egregious omission on last year's list, Tavares went on to score 21 points (eight goals and 13 assists) over 12 games just days after the list came out, eventually setting career bests in goals (31), assists (50) and points (81). The No. 1 pick in 2009 was always a terrific point producer, but he developed more of a two-way game last season, leading the team in driving puck possession (relative Corsi 10.6) to the point that even a "housebound agraphobe [sic]" couldn't leave him off this list twice.
If that last point was the determining factor for Tavares being either fifth overall or off the list entirely, then it's a specious bit of evidence. Lighthouse Hockey was one of the sites that took on Tavares' snub last season, and spells out the curious Relative Corsi argument:
When dealing with possession numbers like Corsi, one needs to take into account context. What this means is that you can't simply use Corsi without taking into account the situations a player is put in when he's on the ice. Corsi and possession numbers don't measure a player's performance directly - like +/-, they measure the performance of the player's team while the player is on the ice. Thus to truly figure out a player's value, one needs to account for things such as competition and TEAMMATES.
… One standard way of doing this is not to look at standard corsi, but RELATIVE corsi, which compares how a team does with that player ON the ice to how the team does with the player off the ice. And once you do, Tavares stands out as the top player on the Isles (or basically tied with Parenteau). Now this isn't as impressive as it sounds - just as with his scoring, Tavares' extra offensive zone faceoffs mean that his possession numbers by definition are going to be above the team's average or at least should be.
But Tavares' relative corsi is at WORST no less than what we'd expect from an average defender with Tavares' favorable minutes. In fact - while I'm not doing the math right now - these numbers are probably above average., In other words, while Tavares may not be extremely proficient at driving possession, he's more than solid (at worst you can go with average, and that's pushing it given the competition Tavares faces). You can give some other players bonuses for D...but you can't ding Tavares.
Sorry for the gluttonous text block from Lighthouse Hockey, but it serves to add valuable context to Greenberg's argument, which succeeds in explaining why Tavares belongs on the latest list but fails to justify his exclusion previously as anything more than an attention-grabber.
Speaking of which, here's why Brad Marchand is better than Tyler Seguin:
Marchand is a two-way player who logged 17:37 per game for Boston, including 2:09 with the man advantage and 1:23 with the penalty-killing unit, and notched his second straight 20-plus goal season. His most frequent linemates, Selke winner Patrice Bergeron and Tyler Seguin, have been on the ice for more shots at net with Marchand than without him.
Will Seguin be a better player than Marchand in the long run? Of course, even taking into account the Nose Face Killah's intangibles as a pest.
But this ranking is meant to be a snapshot of these players at this moment. The argument here, it seems, is that Marchand's body of work, defensive credentials and (one assumes) stellar postseason in the Bruins' Cup year powers him ahead of Seguin. Along with his bar dancing.
This runs counter to the optics from last season — that Seguin became a star and Marchand regressed from the promise of his playoff run — but it's not an unsound argument given where the players are today.
Now … are either of them that much better than Lucic?
What are your thoughts on the list?
Kobe Bryant considering retirement after contract ends: ’3 more years seems like a really long time’
2012

Heading into a season with his Los Angeles Lakers once again entrenched among the unquestioned heavyweights of the NBA, thanks to offseason deals that imported All-Stars Dwight Howard and Steve Nash to join Pau Gasol in a starting lineup that's likely to give opponents fits, you kind of expect Kobe Bryant to spend his preseason talking about how excited he is to play alongside a point guard of Nash's talents, and to groom Howard as the next signature star in the Lakers' illustrious history, and to take deadeye aim at a sixth NBA title (which would, of course, tie him on the all-time list with prototype killer shooting guard/greatest of all time Michael Jordan). And, to be fair, he is doing that. But he's also touching on a topic that's likely to be a bit less thrilling to Lakers fans: the approaching end of his first-ballot Hall of Fame career.
Bryant has two years and $58.3 million remaining on the contract he signed in 2010, a three-year extension that runs through the end of the 2013-14 season. At that point, he'll be just shy of his 36th birthday, and at that point, as he told Ken Berger of CBSSports.com, he thinks he's probably going to be done.
Speaking with CBSSports.com in a quiet moment after practice, Bryant conceded that, in all likelihood, the finish line and the conclusion of his current contract will be one in the same. Bryant has two years left, and though he was careful to point out, "One can never be too sure," he made it clear in the next breath it's almost unfathomable he would play beyond 2013-14, which would be his 18th season.
"It's just that three more years seems like a really long time to continue to stay at a high, high level of training and preparation and health," Bryant said. "That's a lot of years. For a guard? That's a lot of years." [...]
"It's not about health necessarily," he said. "It's about 'Do I want to do it? Do I have that hunger to continue to prepare at a high level?'"
Bryant's comments track with the attitude he expressed several months ago during a lengthy interview with Yahoo! Sports' Graham Bensinger, during which he identified the final year of his current contract as a likely stopping point: "I don't know if I'll play any longer than that."
The 18-season mark represents rarefied air among elite NBA players, especially, as Kobe notes, among guards — while a handful of Hall of Fame big men (Moses Malone, Robert Parish, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Karl Malone and Hakeem Olajuwon) played 18 or more seasons, only two backcourt players enshrined in Springfield have done so: John Stockton, inducted in 2009 following a 19-year career with the Utah Jazz, and Reggie Miller, inducted last month after an 18-year run (mostly off screens) with the Indiana Pacers.
With 18 years in the books and three more coming, thanks to the New York Knicks, Jason Kidd will join Stockton and Reggie when he hangs 'em up; if new running buddy Nash and Ray Allen (16 years down each) finish out their new contracts, they'll likely do the same. But among guards, that's it; that's the list. And considering all Bryant's accomplished in his career, and the fact that none of the other four guards were relied upon to be their team's primary scoring threat until the bitter end, it seems pretty reasonable to slot Kobe in at the top of that list, number one with a bullet, a jaw-jut and a contested jumper that somehow goes in.
[Related: David Stern claims owners are divided on jersey advertisements]
While it might seem borderline unfathomable for fans (especially those who tend to rock purple-and-gold 24 and 8 jerseys on the reg) to consider the impending exit of a player who averaged a 28-5-5 last year and who, even in one of the least efficient seasons of his career, still ranked among the league's top 20 players in per-minute effectiveness, there's only so much you can avoid reality. As TNT commentator Charles Barkley is fond of saying, "Father Time is undefeated," and no matter how many trips Kobe takes to Germany, how much weight he loses in the offseason or how many pepperoni pizzas he eats before games, there's no way around the 51,018 NBA minutes (regular season and postseason combined) that Kobe has put on his body. And with Bryant's Lakers reloaded and looking like serious contenders for NBA championships in each of the two years remaning on his existing deal, fairly reasonable expectations for his minute allotment (baring injury, natch) would push him well past Stockton's 54,162 among HoF-type guards into territory previously trod only by the tall trees.
More than that, the prospect of playing beyond age 36 on legs that have seen nearly 60,000 minutes of NBA action carries with it the likelihood of being a reduced, diminished version of the fire of old. And that can be a pretty good life, if you're in the right situation; after Bryant's July interview with Bensinger, our own Kelly Dwyer considered the possibility that he might stick around after '13-14, perhaps on a lucrative one-year deal that would coincide with the end of the new three-year deal the team just gave Nash, and take another run at a title on a reconfigured team with Howard at the helm and a possibly re-upped Gasol working, as ever, as a super-effective secondary option toward another title that could push Bryant past Michael Jordan in the record books and, if he were to walk away at the peak of accomplishment, perhaps in the memories of some.
[Related: Tracy McGrady finalizing deal to play in China]
But for a perennial killer like Kobe, that's not a prospect he regards warmly, and he quickly told Berger as much:
To hear Bryant, the most cutthroat basketball combatant of his generation, speak about the day -- the moment -- when his smoldering desire to win finally will be extinguished, was something to behold.
So much so that the next question -- about whether Bryant would ever change his mind and hang on for an extra year or two as a role player averaging 15 points just to pad his championship resume -- needn't have been asked.
"That's not gonna happen," Bryant said. "That's just not me."
Then again, retiring at a time when he could still average 20-plus and play deep into the summer doesn't sound a whole lot like Kobe, either. It's difficult to imagine a still-healthy, still-productive, still-bloodthirsty version of Kobe actually walking away after winning one last ring while playing at a high level; it's damn near impossible to envision him doing so after failing to do so.
Mounting anecdotal evidence to the contrary, we should probably still regard the retirement talk as, at best, incredibly premature. A lot can happen in two years, and as a number of players have shown over the years — including Kevin Garnett for the Boston Celtics last postseason — a lion in winter can continue to roar pretty damn loud. Still, the more he talks, the less we can avoid it: At some point soon, Kobe Bryant won't be in the NBA anymore. It's a good thing we've got a couple of years to wrap our heads around that, because it's probably going to take a while.
Related video from Yahoo! Sports:
Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
• Terrell Owens to struggling Jets: 'I'm available! I'm ready, willing, and able!'
• Tracy McGrady finalizing deal to play in China
• Nonito Donaire getting inspiration from world-class Bay Area fighters
• Y! News: Road to White House leads through wild, wonderful, weird Florida
Ryan Williams done for the year. Whoever you add, make sure it isn’t a Cardinal
2012
Over the past two weeks, things have gone from bad to worse to disastrous in the Arizona backfield.
First the Cardinals placed Beanie Wells on the designated-to-return injured reserve list in late September, due to a case of turf toe. Then on Monday, we learned that Beanie's understudy Ryan Williams will miss the remainder of the year with a shoulder injury.
Details right here, via the Arizona Republic:
Williams, who injured the shoulder in Arizona's 17-3 loss to the St. Louis Rams on Thursday, will require season-ending surgery, coach Ken Whisenhunt said Monday.
It's the second straight year Williams has been hurt. He missed all off his rookie year after tearing his patellar tendon in the preseason.
[...]
"The timetable for recovery is three months. That puts him at the end of the season," Whisenhunt said.
Terrible, terrible news. Williams had a long road back following the knee injury, but he'd made it ... and now this. Brutal.
[Peyton Manning! Tom Brady! You're not supposed to be friends!]
The next men up in the Arizona backfield are presumably LaRod Stephens-Howling and William Powell, but those two are also dealing with injuries of as-yet-unknown severity (hip for LSH, head for Powell). Realistically, the Cards are going to have to kick the tires on veteran free agents, guys like Steve Slaton, Ryan Torain, Tim Hightower, and ... well, whoever else can be found on the discard pile. Nobody you'll like, that's for sure.
Arizona has a terrific match-up ahead in Week 6, hosting Buffalo (5.7 YPC allowed). But the Cardinals' O-line is arguably the league's worst. There's no obvious reason for optimism where this running game is concerned, and the team's end-of-season slate is ridiculously tough. Just check the schedule in Weeks 13-17: at NY Jets, at Seattle, vs. Detroit, vs. Chicago, at San Francisco.
So that's not too friendly. Avoid this mess if you can. And keep a good thought for Williams, who's facing another extended recovery.
Fantasy advice from the Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Minute:
Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
• Resourceful Oakland A's forced to pull off improbable in the ALDS
• Anderson Silva's former MMA foes recount facing the G.O.A.T. in the Octagon
• Inspiring teen runner with cerebral palsy finishes 10-mile race (Video)
• Y! News: Road to White House leads through wild, wonderful, weird Florida
Recent Posts
-
Brady Quinn replacing Cassel in Kansas C...October 22, 2012No Comments -
Browns preparing Richardson to play in W...October 22, 2012No Comments -
MJD to be sidelined for an ‘extend...October 22, 2012No Comments -
Bengals HC Lewis: We won’t bench M...October 22, 2012No Comments -
Redskins place Fred Davis on injured res...October 22, 2012No Comments

Recent Comments