It is very well known that the working relationship between star center Dwight Howard and head coach Stan Van Gundy did not end well in Orlando. SVG said that Howard was trying to get him fired, Howard issued several complaints that SVG would make his actions public, Van Gundy was fired, and Dwight left in trade. All things considered, it was pretty much the worst possible resolution to the issues.

On the bright side, not all has been lost in the relationship between the two men. Currently, they're teaming up to do substantive good for Florida schools. From Mike Bianchi for the Orlando Sentinel (via EOB):

If you read my column last week, you know Van Gundy is the chairman of a political group in Seminole County called Citizens for Preservation of Property Values. The goal of the group is to increase property taxes in Seminole County to help preserve the area's traditionally strong public school system — a system that has been decimated by $73 million in budget cuts over the past five years. In the Nov. 6 general election, Seminole voters will decide whether to approve a 1-mill increase in property taxes for four years beginning a year from now. The increase would bring in as much as $25 million annually to the school district.

Van Gundy says Dwight, who was recently traded to the Lakers, is going to lend some financial backing  to the cause. "Dwight has pledged his support," Van Gundy said Monday during an interview on our Open Mike radio show on 740 The Game. "He's a resident of Seminole County, and he's keeping his house here. I think his history will show that he's had great concern for kids in the Central Florida community. With him still living here, we asked him to help and he didn't hesitate."

Surprisingly to some, both Stan and Dwight say they are on good terms and have been communicating regularly over the last several weeks. Van Gundy even texted Howard and wished him good luck after he was traded to L.A.

It is typically considered good form to forgive and forget, and so we must give credit to SVG and Howard for working together to help others. Still, it's surprising that they could put all this behind them after some truly ugly action in Orlando. On the other hand, both seem to be happier now, and maybe that's all that matters.

[Also: Orlando Magic fan sues franchise over use of her image in ads]

It's a cliche to say that squabbles like the ones Van Gundy and Howard had in Orlando are "just business," but that seems to be their point of view in this case. Personally, I'm not sure that I could have seen past the arguments of the past, particularly if I'd been fired as a result. It's unlikely that these two are best friends these days, but it's also genuinely impressive that they were able to move on and do good for others. Dwight Howard has often looked like a child during this ordeal, but he deserves credit here for putting the past aside and doing good for the kids.

Outside the Game from Yahoo! Sports:

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
• Outside the Game: Lamarr Woodley gives back to his Michigan hometown
• Dana White's breakneck lifestyle not going to stop anytime soon, health be damned
• Y! Finance: 8 things the iPhone 5 still can't do
• Brian Kelly seems like he might be, finally, the right coach for Notre Dame

No Comments Share Read More

Stan Van Gundy, after being fired, blasts Orlando Magic CEO Alex Martins’ ‘naiveté’

21 Aug
2012

When former Orlando Magic coach Stan Van Gundy "resigned" to spend more time with his family following the Heat's slow start to the 2005-06 season, he took the high road after being replaced by Heat President Pat Riley, stepping aside silently in the wake of Shaquille O'Neal's displeasure with SVG's exacting ways while remaining on the Miami payroll. Stan was fired by the Magic in late May, and even though he'll remain on the team's payroll, and he's not exactly taking the high and silent road this time around.

Lucky for us, his aim on the low road is absolutely spot on. In an interview with Orlando Sentinel scribe Mike Bianchi on Bianchi's radio show, Van Gundy blasted newly ensconced Magic CEO Alex Martins for the embarrassing turn the team has made since Martins took over the position from the retiring Bob Vander Weide last winter.

"It's a typical lack of understanding from someone who has no sports knowledge, who has never coached or played, who has never been in a locker room….it's a naiveté," Van Gundy said of Martins Monday morning on Mike Bianchi's show on AM 740.

"….I'll stand on the relationships with players based on the results we got.

"I think Alex's comments are based on the fact that Dwight and maybe others didn't like me…and thinking somehow that's important."

Yikes. Stan is basically taking a "count tha ringzz!"-approach in defending the fallout in his final year with the Magic, pointing to a 2009 Finals appearance and his team's consistent solid play despite Howard's halfhearted 2011-12 effort. It's a dangerous thing to do, if we're honest (especially because there are no rings to count, here). We're also reminded of former Atlanta Hawks coach Hubie Brown defending his foul mouth pointed at former Hawks guard John Drew in an interview with Spike Lee, quietly reminding Lee that "the only time Drew was an All-Star was when he was with me."

(Which actually wasn't true, Drew made the team the year before Brown took over in Atlanta, but it's Hubie Brown so shut up.)

Van Gundy is correct when he points out that, at times, it really isn't "important" if stars dig their coaches. Magic Johnson famously got Paul Westhead fired, but he clashed for years with Pat Riley. Michael Jordan broke plays and had Phil Jackson's Chicago Bulls coaching staff spitting mad all the time, Larry Bird always preferred Bill Fitch over K.C. Jones, and the next coach Shaquille O'Neal gets along with will be his first. Too bad he's retired.

This can't be a blanket statement, though, in either direction. Sometimes things don't work out, and great coaches have to go. Van Gundy clearly didn't think he had to go, he didn't appreciate Martins firing him phone after five years on the job, and he surely didn't appreciate the 13-day waiting period between Orlando's first round ouster and the team's dismissal of the coach that seemed to be a dead man walking all the way back in April.

[More NBA: Michael Beasley holds estate sale to get rid of some weird stuff]

Throughout the interview, Stan says he is willing to take some blame for the way things went down, but he also harbors a very serious sense of nostalgia for the Vander Weide and former GM Otis Smith pairing that lorded over a series of disastrous deals (including hiring Florida's Billy Donovan to coach the Magic before he dropped out and made way for Van Gundy) that made Howard so unhappy with his limited supporting cast.

From the chat:

"The Dwight thing was so big….in an effort, I guess, to make Dwight happy and everything else, we compromised a lot of the culture and values we had before that. It's always a mistake when you compromise those things…everything goes South. It was no longer a team-first thing," he said. "It was inevitable things would not go as well.

[…]

"When Bob left, it really became Alex over everything," Van Gundy told AM 740.

Which makes sense. Though Smith was given the go-ahead to try and find a midseason suitor in a deal for Howard, he was clearly on the eventual outs as the season started. Orlando should have immediately let go of Smith following Howard's opting-in to his 2012-13 contract in late March and attempted to find a GM as soon as it could. Instead, the team dragged things out and hired Rob Hennigan just days before the draft in late June, killing any sort of potential for a new GM to explore a deal for Howard with the added influence and possible bargaining position that an NBA draft provides.

There's nothing on record that suggests that Martins was behind the much-criticized deal for Howard, and Hennigan has been thoughtful and clearly knowledgeable as he's discussed Orlando's take for the center. And as someone who wasn't around when Orlando dumped Van Gundy, Hennigan is under absolutely no obligation to utter the name "Stan Van Gundy" or defend his dismissal. On top of all this, even if we agree with Stan, he's also someone who was just fired from a job that he liked regardless of all the storm and stress.

From a gossiper's standpoint, though? To see a former COO come in and dominate Magic press conferences (like Howard's opting-in, last March, or the hiring of Hennigan in June and coach Jacque Vaughn in July) in ways that Vander Weide (no stranger to publicity, with his courtside seat and late night dalliances) rarely did? To see a highly regarded young basketball mind make a confusing deal involving Howard at a very strange time of the year? You're just fine to think that there could be fire behind this smoke, even if it's a fired ex-coach fanning the flames.

And, unlike 2005, it's nice to see Stan sticking around. Apparently he's set to take to our TV sets as an NBA analyst this fall, which should be a good thing.

Although, Stan's not a TV guy. And non-TV guys tend to take to these sorts of gigs with a healthy sense of naiveté. Could Stan Van Gundy be the Alex Martins of the basic cable world?

Nah.

Other popular content on Yahoo! Sports:
• Fantasy: Bold predictions for the 2012 season
• Showtime calls an early end to 'The Franchise'
• SEC once again likely to come down to winner of the west division

No Comments Share Read More

Jeff Van Gundy thinks that Chicago winning half of its games in 2012-13 is ‘a heck of a year’

01 Aug
2012

Pardon the preponderance of Chicago Bulls posts over the last few days, but the team is in such a unique and odd situation that we can't help but stay fascinated over a franchise gone completely batty. Less than 100 days ago it was working with the league's best record and reigning NBA MVP. Now the group is taking on criticism from all comers for its skinflint ways, despite being on pace to pay the luxury tax this season for a team that might not even make the playoffs. Not just the Finals or second round (a place the Bulls have been to just twice since 1998), but the playoff bracket altogether. With Derrick Rose out until possibly March or even April, and the real Derrick Rose probably over a year away from showing up, it's worth considering.

Actually, if you're Jeff Van Gundy speaking his mind on Chicago-area radio station ESPN 1000, you're done considering. The Chicago Bulls, who had the best record in the NBA in 2010-11 and tied for the best record in 2012, are going to have "a heck of a year" if the Bulls even churn out a .500 record. A record that, if 2012 was any indication, would leave them out of the playoffs. Here's JVG's take:

"To lose Rose by itself is going to cost you -- even if you thought they were a 55-win team with Rose -- that costs you 12-15 games right there," Van Gundy said. "And then all the other guys I think people are overlooking. C.J. Watson even with his poor play to Asik in that sixth game, listen, he was a very valuable back-up through all of Rose's injuries last year. He played well, and now, who's their backup, they have Hinrich and who? (Marquis Teague) No, no, he's not ... did you watch him in summer league? "Struggled" is being kind. That's not a knock. The 29th pick in the draft is such a hit-and-miss selection anyway. You have to give him time to grow and mature. But to think he's going to come in and play behind Hinrich next year ..."

Van Gundy — when he's talking about the NBA and not off on some tangent during ABC broadcasts — makes a spot on point as usual. The trickle down in production from Rose to Hinrich, compounded by the fact that Teague is essentially stepping into C.J. Watson's minutes, will cost the Bulls heaps of victories. Nate Robinson can help in that regard, as well, but we're not entirely convinced Bulls coach Tom Thibodeau will be playing Nate tons of minutes. Unless Richard Hamilton misses over half the season again, like he did in 2011-12, which means Hinrich and Robinson will see plenty of time together.

Which we'll have to leave you to see, sober, because we'll be on our ninth beer before those two play their ninth minute together.

Of course, Van Gundy doesn't mention the thread that held it all together last year when Hamilton, Watson, Rose, and Luol Deng missed a combined 94 games: Jeff Van Gundy disciple Tom Thibodeau.

He's pulled off miracles before. The Bulls were a formidable outfit heading into 2010-11, but it's hard to see "62 wins" while looking at that roster on paper. And it's certainly nigh on impossible to think ".758 winning percentage" while looking at last year's roster. Besides that, who thinks ".758 winning percentage?" Pretty specific, pal.

This is the point ESPN Chicago scribe Nick Friedell is trying to make, and it's hard to disagree. Thibodeau has been masterful with rosters we severely underrated. Then again, Nick covers the Bulls and I'm from Chicago, so our glasses are pretty rosy. Even if the Bulls aren't.

(Yes, I hate myself for writing that.)

There's another point, that few are making, that might shoot Nick's idea and my hopes all to hell, though. And it concerns the relative health of Carlos Boozer, and Joakim Noah. If history is any indication, they'll miss far more than the two combined games they sat out in all of 2011-12.

I'd like to think I've beaten the Fluke Injury vs. Injury Prone-horse to a deserved death by now, and none of Boozer and Noah's recent injuries have come from overuse or decaying dangly parts. It's been all fluke injuries for these guys over the last few years. Still, a huge reason the Bulls stayed on top of things in 2011-12 despite injuries to perimeter players was the healthy play of Boozer and Noah. And a big reason the Bulls stayed afloat in 2010-11 despite Boozer and Noah missing a combined 57 games was the play of Taj Gibson, Omer Asik, and (especially) Kurt Thomas. Only Gibson remains, with Asik in Houston and Thomas having shuffled off this mortal coil in New York. And we'd be very surprised if Boozer and Noah combined to play in all but two of Chicago's games next season.

It's always been about the replacement parts, the core of this team, and Chicago just doesn't boast the players it used to. We respect new addition Nazr Mohammed (who has been underrated in his last few years in Charlotte and Oklahoma City) and will always be fans of Hinrich's, but they just don't bring the same skill set as Asik and Watson and they certainly don't bring as much production. Tom Thibodeau might be the NBA's best coach, but he had horses to replace his starting horses with in 2011 and 2012. This year, with Rose unavailable for most of the season and Luol Deng bound to miss some time following post-Olympic surgery, he might be stuck walking the cow.

All while leaving Jeff Van Gundy with a pretty fair point. Damn.

Tags: , Derrick Rose, heck, indication, , Jeff Van Gundy, , percentage, , ,
No Comments Share Read More

The Portland Trail Blazers are taking their sweet time in hiring a new head coach

25 Jul
2012

The Portland Trail Blazers don't have a coach. For their basketball team. You kind of forget as much, this late into July. Especially with new GM Neil Olshey neck deep in a significant rebuilding project that has seen him sign off on two lottery picks and committing eight-figure yearly money to employing Nicolas Batum. You'd assume the Blazers would want to know what coach would be leading all these guys, the guy who would be making the day-to-day and minute-to-minute movements on the fly while Olshey can only watch from above.

The recently hired Portland GM is taking his time, though, and this isn't a criticism. The Portland Trail Blazers are his baby, now, and a baby unlike few others due to the significant wealth that team owner Paul Allen has accrued over the years. Those assets aren't guaranteed to be used with the Blazers, though, so Olshey has to get this right. And by getting it right, he has to get real, real slow-like. And exacting. From the Oregonian:

The candidates who are known to have interviewed with Olshey are Indiana assistant Brian Shaw; Golden State assistant Michael Malone; Dallas assistant Terry Stotts; Memphis assistant David Joerger; former Orlando assistant Steve Clifford, who is nearing a deal to be an assistant in Chicago; Phoenix assistant Elston Turner; Atlanta assistant Lester Conner; Miami assistant David Fizdale, Chicago assistant Adrian Griffin and former Knicks and Phoenix assistant Phil Weber.

It should be pointed out that each of these men have "interviewed with Olshey," but not necessarily for the top job. For someone like prized assistant Steve Clifford, a veteran of that Van Gundy family-crew, Olshey may have gotten in line to attempt to persuade him to become an assistant in Portland, before he jets off to Chicago to join another Van Gundy disciple in Tom Thibodeau.

Instead of, y'know, joining a staff without a head coach.

No famous names in that crew, unless you're the type that is nose deep into an NBA blog in the fourth week of July. With Stan Van Gundy likely wanting to take the year off (while collecting the last year of his contract with the Orlando Magic and needing a break after a miserable and undeserved 2011-12) and other higher-profile candidates otherwise employed, Olshey hasn't had much to work with in the realm of the well-known. Brian Shaw, a barely used reserve on Portland's 1999 team (only to be resurrected as a Blazer killer the following year in Los Angeles) is the biggest name on that list, but even that five-time champion (as a player and assistant coach) isn't someone you put on the cover of your yearly program.

Jason Quick, the Oregonian's top notch Blazers beat writer, doesn't mention Phil Jackson in this list, even though he was rumored to have been offered a gig as Portland's coach. That's likely due to some combination of the infeasible nature of such an offer, and the idea that either Olshey or Jackson's agent Todd Musberger was using the rumor mill to keep both their team and client looking of the highest order.

Quick does point out that Jerry Sloan was considered before Sloan passed along that "the time was not right for him to return." Quick doesn't mention the specific time, but we're guessing it came sometime in the early 1950s, before all those jazz cigarettes and grilled Portobello sandwiches found their way to Portland.

(Ah, who am I kidding? They were probably already there back then.)

The lingering fallback here is interim head coach Kaleb Canales, a respected Blazers employee and Erik Spoelstra-type (that's a too-easy comparison, but an accurate one) who rose from video coordinator all the way to replacing Nate McMillan on the sideline in March. He's been running the team's summer league squad, he has the support of the players from last season (though, seriously, what's LaMarcus Aldridge going to say? "Don't bring that big jerk back?"), and he did well with a semi-tanking Blazers squad over 23 games last spring, winning eight along the way.

Canales' problem is that Olshey inherited him, and Canales is as strange to Olshey as he is to us other Blazer outsiders. On top of that — we should remind that Allen had to move quickly to hire Nate McMillan in 2005 in the midst of a bidding war. With no clear answer this time around, we're sure he doesn't mind Olshey taking his time. Especially with Canales as a solid (and, if we can be a bit crass in basketball terms, somewhat inexpensive) fallback.

We'd applaud the Blazers for taking their time in the wake of what could be termed a throwaway 2012-13 season, but the team really is attempting to move forward. Yes, the squad is banking on point guard Damion Lillard to help sculpt its future, but it also features a 2012 All-Star in Aldridge and the group attempted to move way forward by throwing as much money as it could toward fellow 2012 All-Star Roy Hibbert, before Indiana matched the offer to the restricted free agent. Portland isn't exactly taking the Charlotte approach, here, as it puts a roster together. It's going young, but not that young. Charlotte, by comparison, hasn't really even hired its next set of players yet.

Unless the coach is in place in the draft's decision room, though, or on hand at midnight on July 1, when free-agent offers can be made? There's no real difference between a hiring on July 2 or hiring a new Trail Blazers coach on Thursday, July 26. You can't be in for a penny and somehow in for a pound with an NBA offseason, the chance for that full commitment has passed, and Olshey is taking advantage.

It's more than likely the smartest maneuver. The real judgment will come with who he selects, and not when he selects him.

Other popular content on Yahoo! Sports:
• Adrian Wojnarowski: Dwight Howard's hardline stance makes trade from Orlando difficult
• Cubs pitcher Ryan Dempster takes frustration out on cooler in dugout tantrum
• Martin Rogers: Olympic torch relay's Nazi origins aren't widely known

Tags: , Blazers, , , , Neil Olshey, portland trail blazers, , the Blazers, , ,
No Comments Share Read More

Recent Posts

  • Jim Nantz gets the winner wrong after Patriots beat the Jets
    Jim Nantz gets the winner wrong after Pa...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Bulgaria first as country to host World Match Play (Reuters)
    Bulgaria first as country to host World ...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • The NBA creates a ‘Reggie Miller rule’ in order to punish shooters attempting to kick defenders
    The NBA creates a ‘Reggie Miller rule�...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Panthers GM Hurney fired after team’s 1-5 start (Yahoo! Sports)
    Panthers GM Hurney fired after team̵...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Sergei Kostitsyn hopes NHL season is canceled; are you tired of European player threats?
    Sergei Kostitsyn hopes NHL season is can...
    October 22, 2012No Comments