Worker adjusts microphone under third base before NLCS Game 3 (Photo)

17 Oct
2012
by David Brown in Fantasy Baseball, General

ST. LOUIS — Ever wonder what a real Major League Baseball base looked like underneath? Regardless if the answer is yes or no, you do now. But these bases, like the one in the photo above used for Game 3 of the NLCS, are a little different. They've been retrofitted with microphones so Fox can better pick up its "Sounds of the Game." The microphone is located under the rectangular metal plate, screwed in on the right-hand side.

The worker in the photo was checking each set of bases made by Schutt Sports (there are at least two full sets) during batting practice to ensure the sound was coming through clearly. A technician on the other end of the microphone would advise him if the base sounded "dirty" or "clean" and the worker would whack the base and blow into it — really — to clean it out.

As he was finishing, Marco Scutaro of the San Francisco Giants saw him and asked if he were "blowing it up" like a balloon. Oh, you, Marco!

In case you're wondering what the writing on the sticker says, I transcribed one of them:

ATTENTION:

The purchaser and/or installer of this product is responsible for advising the end user of the possibility of injury while sliding into the base. The installer and/or purchaser shall read and follow safety and installation instructions packaged with this product.
Extra caution should be taken to ensure anchors are clean and base rests properly on playing surface. Under no circumstances should play commence when bottom of base is standing above playing surface. Injury may result.

Do you think anyone actually talks to the major leaguers about the dangers that sliding into bases presents? Maybe it happens during spring training? Anyway, as to the other sticker, it is a warning that the base should not be used in wet or icy conditions. And there's something about a "clear and present danger" to sliding somewhere (home plate?) but I don't know what it says because the post is in the way. Sorry.

Love baseball? Enjoying the postseason?
Follow @AnswerDave, @bigleaguestew, @KevinKaduk on Twitter,
along with the BLS Facebook page!

Tags: , , , microphone, , purchaser, surface
No Comments Share Read More

ALCS Game 4 postponed due to rain

17 Oct
2012

The Detroit Tigers' party in Motown will have to wait at least one more day.

Game 4 of the ALCS at Comerica Park was postponed due to rain on Wednesday night, meaning the Tigers won't get their first chance to advance past the New York Yankees until Thursday afternoon. First pitch is scheduled for 4:07 ET with the pitching matchup — CC Sabathia vs. Max Scherzer — staying intact.

The Tigers lead the Yankees three games to none and are on the brink of their first World Series since 2oo6. The bad news is that Thursday's forecast doesn't look too good, either, with an 80 percent chance of rain. 

While the rain didn't move into Detroit until about 9:15 local time on Wednesday night — approximately 75 minutes after the game was scheduled to start — Major League Baseball made the decision to hold off on starting the game. That led to the strange sight of fans sitting in the stands around a tarp-less field, but MLB said the decision was made to "protect the integrity of a nine-inning game." It'd be hard for either side to argue with that logic given that it meant neither Sabathia nor Scherzer were used up for just an inning or two before a rain delay. That same situation happened when Game 1 of the ALDS was suspended in the middle of the second inning last year and the league attracted plenty of criticism  for letting Sabathia and Justin Verlander effectively waste a start.

The postponement, however, will push Game 5 to Friday, eliminating the travel day before Saturday's Game 6. Brian Cashman says Sabathia will not be able to pitch in an if-necessary Game 7 on Sunday and that's a bad break for the Yankees as it means Sabathia will pitch only once this series. But at least that one appearance will likely come under the terms of his performance and not under the terms of Mother Nature.

Make sure all your bases are covered this postseason ...
Follow @bigleaguestew, @KevinKaduk and the BLS Facebook page!

No Comments Share Read More

Concession Speech: 2012 Baltimore Orioles

17 Oct
2012

With the regular season over, teams are facing an offseason filled with golf rounds and hot-stove strategy.

But we're not going to let them get off that easy. No sir. No way. In an attempt to bring some closure between franchise and follower, we're giving a blogger from each team the opportunity to give a concession speech for this year's squad. Up next is our friend Stacey Long from Camden Chat. She wrote the 10 best things about being an Orioles fan for us earlier this season.

Fellow citizens of Birdland and all those who supported the 2012 Orioles, I welcome you to a new age. An age where the O's are again the toast of the town and where hope blooms in the hearts of a once cynical fan base. It's true that our season came to an end before we were ready, and to that I say this: Be disappointed in the ending, yes, but do not be disappointed in your team. It kept pace in the American League East for 162 games, defeated the defending American League champion Texas Rangers in the wild-card game, and came within one game of conquering the Yankees in the ALDS, a team sporting a $200 million payroll and multiple future Hall of Famers. This 2012 Orioles team was nothing short of miraculous. From the Nate McLouth renaissance to Yankee killer Miguel Gonzalez, who made his major-league debut at age 28, this was a once in a lifetime team.

Mistakes were made: When a team starts the year expected to lose over 90 games, and instead wins 93, mistakes are hard to come by. But oh, what could have been if the Orioles hadn't been swept by the Mets, if they hadn't lost three out of four to the hapless Indians in June? One more win in each series and the Orioles would have tied the Yankees for first place. Or if only Mark Reynolds could have been the Reynolds of 2011 and bashed 35 homers instead of 23, what might have happened? If they hadn't been forced to rely on the defensive nightmare that is Wilson Betemit at third base for much of the season? And, of course, if only their offense slumped for six games in the regular season rather than six games in the playoffs, I might not yet be delivering this concession speech.

Sadly the most glaring mistake made during the Orioles' season was made not by the team, but by the fans (and I include myself). I'm not speaking of the fuss that was made over the relative slowness with which the fans returned to the stadium; that I understand. Our mistake was our preoccupation with the inevitable collapse, a collapse that never arrived. We had our reasons, of course. Having already suffered through 14 losing seasons, our defensive mechanisms have been finely honed. And from all sides we were bombarded with the words of sports writers who claimed it couldn't possibly last because the Orioles just weren't that good. Yes, other than a handful of optimists, we as a group failed to simply enjoy the wins and the joy of watching a competitive baseball team. I will not make that mistake again, and I hope you'll join me.

Mudslinging time: Being in the AL East, the Orioles and their fans have been measured against the Red Sox, Yankees, Rays, and even the Blue Jays for years. The fans have been mocked for letting the Red Sox and Yankees fans invade Camden Yards, games against the Orioles were marked as easy wins on the schedule, even the Blue Jays fans sometimes got high and mighty when comparing the teams (No. 9. The OrioLOLs. Really? Their trash talk is as weak as their pitching staff). So let's measure, shall we?

The Boston Red Sox started the season with high hopes, picked by many to win the whole enchilada. Instead their team fell apart as the manager berated players through the media, players sent text messages asking for him to be fired, and the entire thing turned into a circus. Meanwhile, the O's players took on the personality of their no-nonsense manager, Buck Showalter, and came together like a true team. And while the Orioles called up rookie sensation Manny Machado to man third base and look like they have a future star, the Yankees are looking ahead to five more years and $114 million worth of Alex Rodriguez, and might be the most lifeless team in the postseason.

And the fans? The Red Sox have their own nation, yet the team that has won two World Series since 2004 couldn't be bothered showing up the first time their team put up a losing season since 1997 (don't let that consecutive sellout record fool you, unless the fans loved dressing as green seats). Of course, if I had to watch designated hitter Chris Davis strike out Adrian Gonzalez, I might not want to come back either.

Also, while the Orioles fans welcomed home their team like heroes after losing the ALDS, Yankee Universe couldn't be bothered selling out its playoff games, and the fans that did show booed every player on the playoff roster. I tell you, there isn't another team in the AL East I'd want to be a fan of right now (well ... maybe the Rays if not for Tropicana Field).

But enough negative talk, because when it comes to the Orioles, the future suddenly looks bright.

Hope for the future: It wasn't long ago the the Orioles were a laughingstock and many fans saw nothing bright in the Orioles future. It was less than a year ago that prospective general managers were turning down the job or removing their names from consideration. When Dan Duquette was hired, he wasn't what many Orioles fans wanted, but it's tough to argue with the results of the team he has assembled. When he traded for Jason Hammel, we scoffed. He found a gamer in Miguel Gonzalez in the Mexican League, he signed Wei-Yin Chen out of Japan and he had the guts to call up Manny Machado from Double-A to make the defense much, much better. He tinkered with the roster as much as I've ever seen, and it worked.

Maybe he got lucky with his moves, time will tell. But he got the team this far, and combined with Buck Showalter it finally seems like the management in place is a good fit. The Orioles need to improve both their pitching staff and their lineup for next season, but with a core of Adam Jones, Matt Wieters, Nick Markakis, and J.J. Hardy, young studs like Machado and Dylan Bundy, and the bevy of pitching that Duquette has assembled (with a little help from former GM Andy MacPhail), things could be good in Birdland not only this year, but next as well.

A change is going to come: The landscape of the AL East is changing, friends, and the Orioles have the opportunity to seize control. The Red Sox are rebuilding, the Yankees are old, the Rays are ... a problem, admittedly. Those teams won't stay down for long, so the Orioles need to act now. They need to ride this success into next year and keep the fan base invigorated. We've had a taste of winning, and now nothing else will satisfy us. I've long believed in Showalter is the man to whip these players into shape, and now Duquette is growing on me as well. Are these two men, who didn't quite fit in in their last destinations, just what Birdland needs to remain respectable? Friends, I say yes.

What a team. What a season. It's been a long time since Orioles fans have had much to be happy about in October, and it's a shame that it ended the way that it did. But now we can go into 2013 knowing that opening day won't be the highlight of the year, that the players are going to play hard for Showalter, and that the AL East is ripe for the picking.

Follow Stacey on Twitter and read more at Camden Chat

Previous Concession Speeches: Oakland A's, Cincinnati Reds, Los Angeles Angels, Texas Rangers, Atlanta Braves, Chicago White Sox, Tampa Bay Rays, Milwaukee Brewers, Philadelphia Phillies, Arizona Diamondbacks, Pittsburgh Pirates,Cleveland Indians, Boston Red Sox, Minnesota Twins, San Diego Padres, New York Mets, Miami Marlins, Chicago Cubs, Toronto Blue Jays, Colorado Rockies, Kansas City Royals, Houston Astros

Make sure all your bases are covered this postseason ...
Follow @bigleaguestew, @KevinKaduk and the BLS Facebook page!

Tags: , , , mistake, , ,
No Comments Share Read More

Eddie Yost, nicknamed The Walking Man, dies at 86 (Yahoo! Sports)

17 Oct
2012
BOSTON (AP) -- Eddie Yost, nicknamed ''The Walking Man'' because of his penchant for drawing bases on balls during an 18-year major league career, has died. He was 86.
Tags: , Eddie Yost, , , , penchant, , ,
No Comments Share Read More

Ball Don’t Lie’s 2012-13 NBA Season Previews: The New York Knicks

17 Oct
2012

For the first time in two years we'll have an orthodox, full-length NBA season to look forward to. No lockout nonsense, and precious little obsession as to whether or not LeBron James will ever win the big one. He's won it, already, and our sanity as NBA followers is probably better off as a result. However big that shred of sanity is remains to be seen, following yet another offseason that once again proved that the NBA is full of Crazy McCrazytons that appear to take great delight in messing with us continually.

As a result of that offseason, and the impending regular season, why not mess with Ball Don't Lie's triptych of Kelly Dwyer, Dan Devine and Eric Freeman as they preview the 2012-13 season with alacrity, good cheer, and bad jokes.

We continue with the always reliable New York Knicks.

Kelly Dwyer's Kilt-Straightener

The New York Knicks, for the 37th offseason in a row, have set themselves up for all manner of ridicule with both their moves and non-moves. Jettisoning Jeremy Lin for the seeming failure of character of setting his own price in the open market (after the Knicks had encouraged him to do so) was a needless move, as was adding a third (or second; or, depending how he looks by Christmas, first) guaranteed year on Jason Kidd's contract. J.R. Smith was retained, his brother Chris was brought to camp briefly "just 'cuz," and the team appeared to go out of its way to sign on the most hilarious trending topics (fattest, oldest) of the League Pass set to round it its roster.

Also, Rasheed Wallace.

[Fantasy Basketball '12: Play the official game of NBA.com]

Also, parts. Lots and lots of parts to take advantage of that 82-game schedule that will see team after team alternating bouts of indifference and injury alongside the approximation of "go get 'em!" as 30 teams try to make it to spring. This is why the wins could, if not necessarily "should," stack up.

Famously, the stack will have to work from a foundation that would place Carmelo Anthony almost exclusively at the power forward position he worked so expertly from late last season. With Amar'e Stoudemire hurt towards the end of the 2011-12 turn, the Knicks turned into a dynamite defensive club with Anthony's quick-hit scoring bursts (because the position placed him and his spins and finishes closer to the basket) helping give the team's often-iffy offense just enough to survive. Of course, Stoudemire returned for most of the playoffs, and the team faltered in the first round. Again it was Anthony, 25 feet from the hoop, trying to make it happen.

Of course Stoudemire — truly one of our favorite players at his best, and someone who has grown into a gem of a guy — worked all summer to try and better his low post game. Of course, he's already hurt. Of course, Anthony (who will do whatever it takes) won't do that — he doesn't want to play power forward. Of course, coach Mike Woodson (who has already sold out in one significant way) is going to attempt to kowtow to his star (a star that isn't even his team's best player; that would be Tyson Chandler) in order to stay on at MSG.

And, of course, I don't think it matters.

If Woodson is slow and subversive with the switch, he can make a power forward out of Anthony yet. Those 82games.com numbers could have Carmelo playing way more minutes at the big forward spot if Woodson eases him into things. And for as much as we rip on Anthony for his skittish play at times, the guy is a competitor. He's not going to walk to the bench in protest the first time Woodson sits either Stoudemire (or Chandler, with foul trouble) a few minutes into a half to go small. He's not going to walk to the bench in protest the 30th time, either. Especially when he eases, again, into a power forward role that doesn't have to include much banging. Especially when Jason Kidd, trending as "old," fires him that two-handed lob.

The problem is that New York doesn't do "slow and subversive." New York is full of showy sittings — Sanchez for Tebow, we hear, and A-Rod for Ibanez — and back page blowouts. Mike Woodson knew all of this when he came on last year as Mike D'Antoni's obvious eventual replacement, and he knew all this when he pined for the full time gig after D'Antoni and the Knicks parted ways. He can't complain that things aren't what they were in front of 15,000 fans in Atlanta. He asked for the challenge of taming the Apple, and now he has to follow through on it.

In the meantime, the Knicks will throw out parts. Famous parts, well-compensated parts, productive parts, and day-to-day parts. Packaged properly, this season could turn out to be interesting in ways that have nothing to do with soap opera nonsense. It could just be cold, hard, winning basketball with a lot of nice numbers where big headlines used to be.

You asked for it, men. Time to execute as your city expects.

Projected record: 45-37


Fear Itself with Dan Devine

It is tonally appropriate that the NBA season tips off just before Halloween -- because on any given night, each and every one of the league's 30 teams can look downright frightening. Sometimes, that means your favorite team will act as their opposition's personal Freddy Krueger; sometimes, you will be the one suffering through the living nightmare. In preparation for Opening Night, BDL's Dan Devine considers what makes your team scary and what should make you scared.

What Makes You Scary: An elite defense that might be even better this year. In our '11-12 Knicks preview, I wrote that if Tyson Chandler could lift New York out of the bottom-third of the league in defensive efficiency for the first time since 2003-04 -- Mike D'Antoni's team ranked 22nd in the NBA in points allowed per 100 possessions in '10-11 -- "they ought to throw Tyson a parade." Last year, the Knicks skyrocketed out of that lower tier, improving their defense by a whopping 8.5 points per 100 possessions, according to NBA.com's stat tool, and finishing the year as the league's fifth-ranked unit. Instead of a parade, Chandler had to settle for the NBA's 2011-12 Defensive Player of the Year Award; reasonable folks can argue that he wasn't the trophy's most deserving recipient, but there's no denying his impact.

Some credit, too, belongs to coach Mike Woodson, imported before the season to serve as D'Antoni's "defensive coordinator" and later elevated to interim coach after D'Antoni's resignation. Woodson didn't really earn the defensive reputation he held following his tenure with the Atlanta Hawks, but after he took over, the team got even better on D, allowing just 97.4 points-per-100 over their final 24 games and going 18-6 to finish the regular season. Woodson's primary achievement seemed to be convincing Carmelo Anthony to compete on defense, which, as D'Antoni and George Karl will tell you, is no simple task. But even if the Knicks' defensive improvement was attributable primarily to Chandler being brilliant, Iman Shumpert emerging as a strong wing defender and, later, Anthony flipping the effort switch, the guy overseeing all of it should still get some praise.

The Knicks will miss Shumpert's defense to start the season, as rehab on his surgically repaired torn left anterior cruciate ligament will keep him out until at least December. But offseason signee Ronnie Brewer returned to practice Wednesday morning after missing more than a month with a tear to the medial meniscus in his right knee, opening up the possibility that the former Chicago Bulls defensive ace could be ready to step in for Shumpert come the start of the regular season. When Shumpert returns, the tandem will allow Woodson to keep a long, quick, tough, versatile perimeter defender on the floor at virtually all times; in a league with a lot of wing firepower, athletic import James White and noted bargain J.R. Smith (who will never stop wandering and freelancing, but was often engaged and attentive last season) could help, too.

The same presence-at-all-times idea informed the offseason re-acquisition of Marcus Camby, who, even at 38, represents an improvement on the glass and on D over any reserve big New York employed last season, theoretically enabling Woodson to give Chandler more frequent breathers without worrying that the Knicks' defense will collapse in his absence. (Interestingly enough, the numbers suggest that it didn't necessarily go to hell in a hand basket when Chandler sat last season -- NBA.com's stat tool and 82games.com both have the Knicks' D at around one point-per-100 worse with Tyson sitting, and BasketballValue.com's lineup data suggest they were actually 1.5-per-100 better when he rested.) Many Knicks fans would probably rather have seen Jared Jeffries' frontcourt versatility return to the roster than ancient Kurt Thomas brought back into the fold, but Thomas was still a tough, strong defender in Portland last season; similarly, fellow elder Jason Kidd posted a better defensive rating than both Mike Bibby and Baron Davis, who saw more than 1,100 combined minutes at the point for New York last year.

Increased wing depth and even slight improvements in the weaker reserve spots, combined with Chandler's continued ability to erase teammates' mistakes and single up any big in the league, give New York's defense a chance to nudge even higher than last year's elite finish ... especially if Anthony's final-month buy-in wasn't just a limited time offer.

What Should Make You Scared: Duh. As we laud Woodson's impact on the Knicks' defense, it's worth noting that their sputtering offense -- 19th in the league in offensive efficiency at season's end, according to NBA.com's stat tool, a dramatic drop from their No. 5 finish in '10-11 -- also improved dramatically under him. In his 24-game stint, the Knicks averaged 106.1 points-per-100; over the course of the regular season, that would have made them the fourth most potent offense in the league, and the best in the East.

There's a caveat, though: During that stretch, both Amar'e Stoudemire and Jeremy Lin were out of the lineup, which both removed any doubt that Anthony would be the team's top option (which had existed since Lin's emergence) and pushed him to the power forward slot, where he was far more effective (as he was the season before). The Carmelo/Amar'e problem didn't get solved; it just got tabled. Now, it's back.

After Anthony came over to the Knicks at the '10-11 trade deadline, he and Stoudemire often seemed awkward sharing the floor in the 24 games they played together, looking uncomfortable as they tried to make their volume-scoring, ball-dominating, space-occupying games mesh. Still, though, the Knicks continued to score, with lineups featuring the two stars producing an average of 110.7 points per 100 possessions in 672 shared minutes, per NBA.com's lineup data. Unfortunately for Knicks fans, they couldn't stop anybody, giving up 110.9-per-100. Chandler was brought in last year to fix the defense, and he did ... but the offense went in the tank. Lineups featuring the Anthony-Stoudemire duo (99.1-per-100 in 976 regular-season minutes, which would've been the league's eighth worst efficiency over a full season) and the Anthony-Stoudemire-Chandler trio (98.5-per-100 in 794 minutes, which would've tied for sixth-worst) struggled mightily.

It's pretty simple: If Woodson can't figure a means of improving the Knicks' offensive production when his three highly paid frontcourt All-Stars share the floor, and especially when his top two guns play together, New York will again fail to make any real postseason noise.

Stoudemire's summer Dream discipleship could help, provided STAT finds early success in the low post; Anthony meaning it when he says he'd "rather play off [his point guards] and do what I do best," which (as we saw in London) is catch, shoot and score quickly, would help, too. While I believe the Knicks' front office was wrong to evaluate Jeremy Lin as a less attractive option at the point than Kidd, the re-acquired Raymond Felton or Argentine import Pablo Prigioni, I tend to agree with Howard Megdal's assessment that the team, on the whole, enters this season better at the one.

Better, more stable point play, the addition of Camby to help create extra possessions on the offensive glass, a full season of Steve Novak doing what he does best, and Amar'e and 'Melo doing what they say they're going to do could push New York's offense into the top half of the league. If that happens and the defense holds, the Knicks could wind up with home-court advantage in the first round for the first time since 2000-01.

"Could."

The fear -- and, frankly, more likely outcome -- is that Stoudemire's post experiment is jettisoned at the first sign of failure in favor of a reversion to his familiar elbow face-up game, which looked creaky and fail-filled last season. That even if using 'Melo at the four alongside space-creator Novak at the three is the team's best bet for generating quality looks, 'Melo will refuse it. That even if Amar'e is ineffective, Woodson won't send him to the bench because it would mean ruffling both STAT and 'Melo. That, in a shocking revelation, Felton/Kidd/Prigioni ain't exactly the Holy Trinity. And that come the All-Star break, we'll still be wondering how the Knicks can mesh.

Sweet dreams, Knickerbocker fans.

Eric Freeman's Identity Crisis

There is no more important asset for a basketball team than talent, and yet the more loaded squad does not always win. What we've seen in recent seasons isn't only that the best team wins, but that the group with the clearest sense of self, from management down through the players, prevails. A team must not only be talented, but sure of its goals, present and future, and the best methods of obtaining them. Most NBA teams have trouble with their identity. Eric Freeman's Identity Crisis is a window into those struggles, the accomplishment of realizing a coherent identity, and the pitfalls of believing these issues to be solved.

After several bumps in the road — a long and winding trade saga, a coaching change, a media sensation, and a refusal to commit to said sensation as a real player — the Knicks most assuredly belong to Carmelo Anthony. In most opinions, that's not a good thing. At best, the Knicks have sacrificed their long-term flexibility for a middling East playoff team — at worst, they've hitched their wagon to an overrated star with few elite skills. With so much money tied up in Anthony and his frontcourt partners Amar'e Stoudemire and Tyson Chandler, the Knicks are who they are. Enjoy it if you can, I guess.

For the most part, their image is not a positive one. The Knicks are by turns old, offensively stagnant, and not always committed to the cause, prone to lapses in judgment and ability alike. This is a good team, but not a particularly imposing one. When Linsanity hit last winter, the joy was in large part the idea that the Knicks could surprise, that they could deploy an X-factor and receive unexpected rewards. The current team is relatively ossified, no matter how many aging role players they added over the summer.

If this situation sounds a little depressing and a lot disappointing, that's because it is. When Donnie Walsh remade the Knicks following the Isiah Thomas-orchestrated dark ages, there was hope that the franchise could return to relatively sane relevance for a prolonged period. That era lasted all of a few months, giving way to the same impatience and lack of vision that typified the previous term. That the Knicks look like a playoff team is immaterial. The problem, and the quality that defines them, is a general dysfunction that casts any single positive move as an aberration in the context of institutional rot.

And yet, given that mess, they do remain the Knicks, a team that will always look moderately attractive simply because of the tradition and aura associated with playing in a basketball-mad city that doubles as the cultural capital of the biggest city in North America. Even when the team looks screwed up beyond repair, there's still hope that they can become a major NBA franchise once again. Unfortunately, the same belief (of fans, analysts, observers, laymen, etc.) that sustains them also makes them increasingly prone to mismanagement.

No Comments Share Read More

C-USA Preview: With good health, Tulane could jump from last place to relevance

17 Oct
2012

Over dinner on the peanut shell-strewn balcony of an uptown New Orleans bar, Ed Conroy listened to a sales pitch he fully expected to turn down.

College Hoops Countdown, No. 10: Conference USA

• With good health, Tulane could jump from last place to relevance
• Conference USA Capsule Preview: For Memphis, success this season will be measured in March

For more news on Conference USA, visit Rivals.com

From 2006 to 2010, Conroy had transformed the Citadel from a seven-win laughingstock into a winning program, a feat thought to be nearly impossible before he achieved it. Then in spring 2010, Tulane president Scott Cowen and athletic director Rick Dickson tried to persuade him to leave the waterfront house he loved, the school he once played for and the players he'd recruited to tackle a rebuilding project as daunting as the one he'd just completed.

"We were winning more games than the Citadel had ever won, I had a fantastic group of guys and it was my alma mater, a place I really cared about," Conroy said. "Myself and my staff, we weren't looking. But when I came down here and spoke to President Cowen and Rick Dickson about where they thought Tulane could go, I just thought it could be a really neat challenge."

What sold Conroy on leaving the Citadel for Tulane was the opportunity to vie for conference titles in a stronger league and the resources Tulane was willing to spend to make it feasible.

Unlike the Big South, where the conference champion typically became first-round NCAA tournament fodder for an elite program, winning in Conference USA meant national relevance. Furthermore, Cowen and Dickson promised the university had sufficiently recovered from Hurricane Katrina to invest in basketball by beginning construction on a new practice facility, renovating its aging arena and increasing its budget for everything from scheduling to academic support.

Two and a half years after Conroy's surprise move to Tulane, he's beginning to make it look like a wise decision. With Conference USA freshman of the year Ricky Tarrant back for his sophomore season, double-double threat Josh Davis anchoring the frontcourt and 7-footer Tomas Bruha and high-scoring Kendall Timmons back from injury, the Green Wave suddenly appear to have the ingredients necessary for a leap to the upper half of the league standings.

"We're getting better," Conroy said. "When we arrived, we had a kid playing center for us who was about 6-6 1/2. Now, it's totally different from a size standpoint, a depth standpoint, a talent standpoint. In that aspect, it was a total rebuild. Every aspect of it."

It shouldn't be a surprise Conroy would make strides at Tulane because rebuilding wayward programs has been his specialty. He began his head coaching career at Division II Sir Francis Marion, which won three games the year before he arrived, and later led the Citadel to a rare 20-win season even though the program had lost 20 or more five of the previous six years.

Conroy's penchant for taking the road less traveled began in high school when he accepted an invitation to play basketball at the Citadel against the advice of much of his family.

At the time, Conroy's first cousin, Pat Conroy, was barred from the Citadel campus for writing a book entitled "My Losing Season" that detailed his traumatic senior year as point guard for the Bulldogs. Citadel coach Les Robinson needed special permission from his administration just to recruit a member of Pat Conroy's family, yet once he got it, he was able to quickly form a strong bond with Ed.

"I really wasn't that fired up about going south and going to a military school and my cousin wasn't exactly popular there at the time, but coach Les Robinson and his staff, I grew to really like them," Ed Conroy said. "Once I met the people there and furthered my relationship with them, I was hooked. I remember getting on a plane going back thinking that's where I'm going to go and I'm not going to let anybody talk me out of it."

The foundation for Conroy's coaching philosophy began to take shape during his playing days at the Citadel.

He learned to be organized, disciplined and detail-oriented. He learned the importance of surrounding himself with quality people. And he learned that hard work a day at a time would eventually build up into something big.

Those lessons are the ones he tries to remember even though his first two years at Tulane have included more valleys than peaks.

In Conroy's first season as coach of Tulane, the Green Wave won 10 of 13 non-league games against a weak schedule and started 2-0 in Conference USA before losing all but one game the rest of the way. A more talented Tulane team started last season 12-2 including an upset of Georgia Tech, but the Green Wave again faded in league play, this time done in by injuries to Timmons and Bruha that left them undermanned and overmatched.

The return of the 6-foot-5 Timmons from a torn Achilles tendon gives Conroy another proven perimeter scorer to pair with emerging star Tarrant and long-range shooter Jordan Callahan. And if Bruha has fully recovered from his recurring knee issues, he can help Josh Davis defend the paint and control the backboards.

That nucleus combined with a promising incoming class gives Tulane enough talent to challenge for an upper-division Conference USA finish. The challenge for that group now is that it must learn how to win.

"I think we've been competitive all along, but there's another level where you're winning some of the close games and you're relevant," Conroy said. "Hopefully now we can start to finish off some games and start to take the next step."

Tags: Citadel, , Conference USA, Ed Conroy, , , , Pat Conroy, Preview, , The Citadel
No Comments Share Read More

NFL adds second game in United Kingdom for 2013

17 Oct
2012

The National Football League is expanding its International Series, adding a second game in London's Wembley Stadium during the 2013 season, the league announced on Tuesday. It will be the first time that London has played host to two NFL games in the same season.

On Oct. 11, 2012, the NFL had previously announced a game between the Jacksonville Jaguars, who will be the home team, and the San Francisco 49ers, which is scheduled for Oct. 27, 2013. The Jaguars have agreed to play four home games in London between 2013 and 2016, replacing the St. Louis Rams, who backed out of a three-year commitment to London in order to focus on reaching a new stadium deal in St. Louis. The Rams will host the New England Patriots at Wembley Stadium on Oct. 28, 2012.

On Tuesday, the league added a game between the Minnesota Vikings and Pittsburgh Steelers on Sept. 29, 2013. The Vikings, who will be in the process of building a new stadium, will be the home team.

"Since we started playing regular-season games in London five years ago, we have heard very clearly from our UK fans — they want more football." NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said from the owner meetings in Chicago. "We are excited to play two games in London and take this next step in the growth of our game. We believe that more football will lead to more fans."

Adding a second game in the United Kingdom has been a goal of Goodell's for quite some time. As initially reported by Daniel Kaplan of the SportsBusiness Journal following a Sept. 27, 2011 press conference to announce that New York/New Jersey would host Super Bowl XLVIII, Goodell had hoped to have a second game in the United Kingdom for the 2012 season.

With Steelers chairman emeritus Dan Rooney serving as the United States Ambassador to Ireland, the NFL has considered bringing a regular-season game to the Emerald Isle, but the focus appears to be centered on London, a city the league hopes may become a viable option for a full-time franchise.

"Again, if we can play multiple regular-season games there, that gives you a better opportunity to be successful if you choose to put a franchise in London," Goodell said. "But again, that is the other reason for putting two games in London — we are trying to build that fan base in London. We welcome the fans coming from other parts of Europe. But this is a way to really build that fan base right now in London, which will be critical if you did have a franchise there."

Building and expanding a fan base in London is a great idea, but putting a full-time franchise overseas makes little or no sense.

For starters, that franchise is going to have a difficult time attracting free agents; 40.6 percent of the 1,691 players on NFL rosters at the beginning of the season were from California, Texas, Florida or Georgia. Good luck getting players to move 4,000 to 6,000 miles and across an ocean. (Some players may not even know where London is.) That is, of course, if the team is even based in London. It would make more sense from an operations standpoint -- road travel, signing free agents, adding players during the season, etc... -- for a franchise to set up a base on the Eastern Seaboard of the United States and pop over to London during game weeks.  But if that's the case, that franchise will have to board a plane before every game, and will surely struggle to build a real connection to the city of London that it needs to be a success.

In other words, let's get Los Angeles a team (or two) before we jump the pond.

No Comments Share Read More

Read the full NHL CBA proposal to players, including end of Gary Bettman as appellate judge

17 Oct
2012

In case you were wondering if the National Hockey League was on the power play in their latest proposal to players, here's the equivalent of unleashing a Zdeno Chara slap shot: The NHL released the full contents of their proposal on Wednesday morning, in an unprecedented, cards-on-the-table move.

It was one made out of necessity, as news leaked all over about the proposal. But here it is, as the NHLPA received it. Kudos to the NHL for making it so.

A few of the highlights:

• The salary cap would be $59.9 million for the 2012-13 season; but seeing as how 16 teams are currently over that limit, the NHL will allow teams to go over that cap up to $70.2 million for this season only. The salary cap floor will be $43.9 million; every team in the League is over that floor at the moment.

• The rookie contract maximum is two years, unless a player plays a partial season in which case the contract will cover that season and two subsequent seasons. This is an attack on the "second contracts" for players, which have proven to be some of the most lucrative in the NHL and inflationary to the cap system.

• Hockey Related Revenue still needs "mutual clarification," which is no doubt still a sticking point for the NHLPA.

• Finally, this one:

Introduction of additional procedural safeguards, including ultimate appeal right to a "neutral" third-party arbitrator with a "clearly erroneous" standard of review.

That's right: Brendan Shanahan's massive suspensions (i.e. a "clearly erroneous" judgment on a player's actions) will be reviewed by a third-party arbitrator rather than the man who hired Shanahan to make the rulings, i.e. Gary Bettman.

Read the full NHL proposal …

Term:

Six-year Agreement with mutual option for a seventh year.

HRR Accounting:

Current HRR Accounting subject to mutual clarification of existing interpretations and settlements.

Applicable Players' Share:

For each of the six (6) years of the CBA (and any additional one-year option) the Players' Share shall be Fifty (50) percent of Actual HRR.

Payroll Range:

Payroll Range will be computed using existing methodology. For the 2012/13 season, the Payroll Range will be computed assuming HRR will remain flat year-over-year (2011/12 to 2012/13) at $3.303 Billion (assuming Preliminary Benefits of $95 Million).

2012/13 Payroll Range…

Lower Limit = $43.9 Million

Midpoint = $51.9 Million

Upper Limit = $59.9 Million

Appropriate "Transition Rules" to allow Clubs to exceed Upper Limit for the 2012/13 season only (but in no event will Club's Averaged Club Salary be permitted to exceed the pre-CBA Upper Limit of $70.2 Million).

Cap Accounting:

Payroll Lower Limit must be satisfied without performance bonuses.

All years of existing SPCs with terms in excess of five (5) years will be accounted for and charged against a team's Cap (at full AAV) regardless of whether or where the Player is playing. In the event any such contract is traded during its term, the related Cap charge will travel with the Player, but only for the year(s) in which the Player remains active and is being paid under his NHL SPC. If, at some subsequent point in time the Player retires or ceases to play and/or receive pay under his NHL SPC, the Cap charge will automatically revert (at full AAV) to the Club that initially entered into the contract for the balance of its term.

Money paid to Players on NHL SPCs (one-ways and two-ways) in another professional league will not be counted against the Players' Share, but all dollars paid in excess of $105,000 will be counted against the NHL Club's Averaged Club Salary for the period during which such Player is being paid under his SPC while playing in another professional league.

In the context of Player Trades, participating Clubs will be permitted to allocate Cap charges and related salary payment obligations between them, subject to specified parameters. Specifically, Clubs may agree to retain, for each of the remaining years of the Player's SPC, no more than the lesser of: (i) $3 million of a particular SPC's Cap charge or (ii) 50 percent of the SPC's AAV ("Retained Salary Transaction"). In any Retained Salary Transaction, salary obligations as between Clubs would be allocated on the same percentage basis as Cap charges are being allocated. So, for instance, if an assigning Club agrees to retain 30% of an SPC's Cap charge over the balance of its term, it will also retain an obligation to reimburse the acquiring Club 30% of the Player's contractual compensation in each of the remaining years of the contract. A Club may not have more than two (2) contracts as to which Cap charges have been allocated between Clubs in a Player Trade, and no more than $5 million in allocated Cap charges in the aggregate in any one season.

System Changes:

Entry Level System commitment will be limited to two (2) years (covering two full seasons) for all Players who sign their first SPC between the ages of 18 and 24 (i.e., where the first year of the SPC only covers a partial season, SPC must be for three (3) years).

Maintenance of existing Salary Arbitration System subject to: (i) total mutuality of rights with regard to election as between Player and Club, and (ii) eligibility for election moved to five years of professional experience (from the current four years).

Group 3 UFA eligibility for Players who are 28 or who have eight (8) Accrued Seasons (continues to allow for early UFA eligibility -- age 26).

Maximum contract length of five (5) years.

Limit on year-to-year salary variability on multi-year SPCs -- i.e., maximum increase or decrease in total compensation (salary and bonuses) year-over-year limited to 5% of the value of the first year of the contract. (For example, if a Player earns $10 million in total compensation in Year 1 of his SPC, his compensation (salary and bonuses) cannot increase or decrease by more than $500,000 in any subsequent year of his SPC.)

Re-Entry waivers will be eliminated, consistent with the Cap Accounting proposal relating to the treatment of Players on NHL SPCs playing in another professional league.

NHL Clubs who draft European Players obtain four (4) years of exclusive negotiating rights following selection in the Draft. If the four-year period expires, Player will be eligible to enter the League as a Free Agent and will not be subject to re-entering the Draft.

Revenue Sharing:

NHL commits to Revenue Sharing Pool of $200 million for 2012/13 season (based on assumption of $3.303 Billion in actual HRR). Amount will be adjusted upward or downward in proportion to Actual HRR results for 2012/13. Revenue Sharing Pools in future years will be calculated proportionately.

At least one-half of the total Revenue Sharing Pool (50%) will be raised from the Top 10 Revenue Grossing Clubs in a manner to be determined by the NHL.

The distribution of the Revenue Sharing Pool will be determined on an annual basis by a Revenue Sharing Committee on which the NHLPA will have representation and input.

For each of the first two years of the CBA, no Club will receive less in total Revenue Sharing than it received in 2011/12.

Current "Disqualification" criteria in CBA (for Clubs in Top Half of League revenues and Clubs in large media markets) will be removed.

Existing performance and "reduction" standards and provisions relating to "non-performers" (i.e., CBA 49.3(d)(i) and 49.3(d)(ii)) will be eliminated and will be adjusted as per the NHL's 7/31 Proposal.

Supplemental and Commissioner Discipline:

Introduction of additional procedural safeguards, including ultimate appeal right to a "neutral" third-party arbitrator with a "clearly erroneous" standard of review.

No "Rollback"

The NHL is not proposing that current SPCs be reduced, re-written or rolled back. Instead, the NHL's proposal retains all current Players' SPCs at their current face value for the duration of their terms, subject to the operation of the escrow mechanism in the same manner as it worked under the expired CBA.

Players' Share "Make Whole" Provision:

The League proposes to make Players "whole" for the absolute reduction in Players' Share dollars (when compared to 2011/12) that is attributable to the economic terms of the new CBA (the "Share Reduction"). Using an assumed year-over-year growth rate of 5% for League-wide revenues, the new CBA could result in shortfalls from the current level of Players' Share dollars ($1.883 Billion in 2011/12) of up to $149 million in Year 1 and up to $62 million in Year 2, for which Players will be "made whole." (By Year 3 of the new CBA, Players' Share dollars should exceed the current level ($1.883 Billion for 2011/12) and no "make whole" will be required.)

Any such "shortfalls" in Years 1 and 2 of the new CBA will be computed as a percentage reduction off of the Player's stated contractual compensation, and will be repaid to the Player as a Deferred Compensation benefit spread over the remaining future years of the Player's SPC (or if he has no remaining years, in the year following the expiration of his SPC). Player reimbursement for the Share Reduction will be accrued and paid for by the League, and will be chargeable against Players' Share amounts in future years as Preliminary Benefits. The objective would be to honor all existing SPCs by restoring their "value" on the basis of the now existing level of Players' Share dollars.

• • •

The final section here is a key one: Deferring payment on current contracts. Will the NHLPA actually trust the League to come through?

Donald Fehr responded to the offer in a letter to the players, as revealed by TSN's Bob McKenzie, including this bit on the last section:

"The proposal includes a "Make Whole" provision, to compensate players for the anticipated reduction in absolute dollars from last year (2011-12), to this year and next year. However, it would work like this. The Players Share in subsequent years would be reduced so that this "Make Whole" payment would be made. It is players paying players, not owners paying players. That is, players are "made whole" for reduced salaries in one year by reducing their salaries in later years."

Yeah ... this might not fly.

Tags: , , , , payroll, , , SPCs
No Comments Share Read More

Ball Don’t Lie’s 2012-13 NBA Season Previews: The Boston Celtics

17 Oct
2012

For the first time in two years we'll have an orthodox, full-length NBA season to look forward to. No lockout nonsense, and precious little obsession as to whether or not LeBron James will ever win the big one. He's won it, already, and our sanity as NBA followers is probably better off as a result. However big that shred of sanity is remains to be seen, following yet another offseason that once again proved that the NBA is full of Crazy McCrazytons that appear to take great delight in messing with us continually.

As a result of that offseason, and the impending regular season, why not mess with Ball Don't Lie's triptych of Kelly Dwyer, Dan Devine and Eric Freeman as they preview the 2012-13 season with alacrity, good cheer, and bad jokes.

We continue with the pipe-smoking (probably) Boston Celtics.

Kelly Dwyer's Kilt-Straightener

The image has been blurred, somewhat. The Boston Celtics needed seven games to down a rather ordinary Philadelphia 76ers squad in the second round last season, and were only challenging the eventual champion Miami Heat when Chris Bosh was on the sideline and LeBron James was clueless about interior play. The Heat downed the Celtics by an average of 16 points a contest in Games 6 and 7 during last spring's conference finals, numbers that were probably more representative of Boston and Miami's respective stations last season than the five games that preceded those striking Heat wins.

Possibly.

The whole point of the 2012-13 Boston Celtics is that they want another chance. They want to get to a point, sometime next spring, where they can accurately determine what the fluke was between those Game 6 and 7 Miami wins, and the 2-1 record Boston enjoyed against Miami during the regular season in games that LeBron actually played in (3-1, overall). Even if you toss out the late-season game that James missed against Boston, that's a 5-5 season split between Boston and Miami, and the Celtics seem expressly designed to put the Heat in the same sort of dodgy position that flummoxed them at times during the team's uneasy run from The Decision to last June's triumph.

They want to see if James will want to dig in and traipse all over them again. We're so assured of James' dominance towards the end of the Eastern Conference finals and NBA Finals that we more or less take his new low post know-how as a given. The Celtics want to see if he's willing to give it to them, again, next spring. And I kind of want to watch, because I'm a sickie.

The space between a drizzly autumn and a brightened spring is an eternity for those old legs. And the Celtics took a roundabout way of buttressing their roster against the hoped-for reunion with the Heat on a playoff stage — watching as Ray Allen joined the Heat as a free agent as a way to spite Boston's newfound love of all things Rajon-y and Rondo-y. Allen has his ring, won in 2008 with the C's, so to Boston fans his chase for a second ring was kind of a jerk move on the surface, though the same fans should be assured the Celtics wasted no time in expertly rebuilding.

[Fantasy Basketball '12: Play the official game of NBA.com]

Because the contract extension handed to Kevin Garnett still allowed Boston to toss all manner of exceptions all over the free-agent field, Jason Terry and Courtney Lee will step in to provide the sort of pell-mell offense and sound enough defense that Allen's play at off guard lacked last season. The spacing won't be nearly the same — even if Lee's marks from long range are to be feared by opponents, defenses won't be giving Lee an all-out blitz on the perimeter as they did with Allen, blitzed that opened up lanes for an offense that struggled terribly last season.

The defense, even with yet another year added to Garnett's legendary legs, should remain stout. Hell, it might even improve. Losing Greg Steimsma's shot-blocking hurts, but losing his legendary fouling technique will not. Darko Milicic is a deserved joke at this point, but he'll either block shots and respond to the first enviable group of teammates since his stint in Detroit, or coach Doc Rivers just won't play the guy. Avery Bradley, upon his return, could be something special. Jeff Green is famously overpaid at this point, but if he turns into the next Derrick McKey few will complain.

The pressure is on Rondo, though. He's fearless, and a joy to watch; but too often last year he resorted to the sort of offensive play that reminded you more of a Mark Jackson or even an All-Star-leveled Brevin Knight, as opposed to the all-world point man he likes to fancy himself as. The league-leading assists are fantastic, but how can the NBA's best point guard man the helm of a team that finished 27th out of 30 teams in points per possession? Does he have the sort of offensive-minded teammates that a Chris Paul or Steve Nash get to boast? No, but 12 points per game and sub-60 percent shooting from the line just isn't going to cut it for a team that badly, badly needs buckets.

Part of point guard stardom is the leadership qualities inherent in structuring a winner from huddle to goal. And part of being a leader means an able understanding of exactly what your team needs. And 3.4 free-throw attempts per game and endless amounts of passed-up shots is not leadership — it's stat hounding.

This is Rondo's year to prove me wrong. And Boston's chance to get there, all over again. Throughout the summer, we trumped their chances to ride matchups and veteran play back to the Finals for the third time in six years this June. Pity they have to play from October until April until it's time to start.

Projected record: 47-35

Fear Itself with Dan Devine

It is tonally appropriate that the NBA season tips off just before Halloween -- because on any given night, each and every one of the league's 30 teams can look downright frightening. Sometimes, that means your favorite team will act as their opposition's personal Freddy Krueger; sometimes, you will be the one suffering through the living nightmare. In preparation for Opening Night, BDL's Dan Devine considers what makes your team scary and what should make you scared.

What Makes You Scary: Kevin Garnett (duh), Rajon Rondo (duh) and depth behind the remixed Big Three. It wasn't always pretty -- in fact, we'd kind of like to forget that whole seven-game second-round rockfight with the Philadelphia 76ers, if it's all the same to you. But after being under .500 at the All-Star break, losing their Hall of Fame sharpshooter for nearly a third of the season with ankle injuries, sputtering their way to a bottom-third-of-the-league offense and then losing their best perimeter defender to a shoulder injury, there the Celtics were, one win away from their third NBA Finals trip in five years.

They were there because even after 17 years, 50,600 combined regular- and postseason minutes and a nearly incalculable number of basket-stanchion headbutts, KG just keeps cranking along, turning our pathetic articles and lousy analysis into a potent bathtub rageahol that enables him to continue at his historic, soaked-an-hour-before-tipoff pace. He's still blowing up high screen-and-rolls, still calling opponents' offenses better than their own point guards and, as he reminded us by topping 20 points 10 times last postseason, still plenty capable of filling it up, too. (Remember, KG had been the best player in the Eastern Conference finals before LeBron's Game 6 changed ... well, everything.) He's back, for three more years, and at this point, to doubt his ability to continue being KG is to defy evidence.

They were there because Rondo took over the team, showed that he could dominate games by scoring as well as by passing and rebounding, and proved that whether or not he's the quote-unquote "best point guard in the game," he is inarguably one of its greatest and most difficult-to-solve riddles. He's back, now the clear and defined leader of the team, looking for all the world like an MVP candidate ready to emerge as a nightly marvel in all facets of the game.

This time around, though, the Celtics look deeper and more versatile. Ray Allen's flown south, replaced by former Sixth Man of the Year Jason Terry and apparent offseason steal Courtney Lee, and with all due respect to the surefire first-ballot Hall of Famer, you can forgive Celtics fans for feeling like trading one nearly 38-year-old for two younger guys whose career 3-point shooting marks are two percentage points lower than his and who can do a bit more on the court (especially Lee, on the defensive end) represents a pretty good deal. If third-year defensive ace Avery Bradley, one of the league's more improved players last season, returns in December (if not earlier) and in full health from his offseason shoulder surgeries -- yes, plural, which is the worry -- coach Doc Rivers might just be right in suggesting that his team's got the best four-guard rotation in the league. (They're still short a backup point, though.)

Add a thankfully heart-healthy Jeff Green to back up captain Paul Pierce and key cog Brandon Bass, a potential late-first-round theft in rookie Jared Sullinger to provide low-post scoring punch, and the hilarious combination of Jason Collins and a possibly murderous Darko Milicic to provide 12 hard fouls a night (18, if also thankfully heart-healthy Chris Wilcox comes back whole from his bout with back spasms) and this Celtics team looks like it's grown new rows of teeth behind that razor-sharp first tier to which we've grown accustomed. A sixth straight Atlantic Division title seems likely; another run to within one win of the Finals seems very realistic; a different outcome seems possible. I bet Erik Spoelstra finds that at least a little scary.

What Should Make You Scared: Injuries and the Miami Heat. For a Celtics team that's gone to two Finals, winning one and coming within a quarter of winning a second, all that really matters is competing for championships. To do so, they will have to get past the Heat, an incredibly daunting task as we detailed on Monday, and to do that, they'll need to be at or pretty darn close to full strength come early summer.

Can Bradley come back from dual shoulder surgeries to give Boston a legitimate defensive weapon against Dwyane Wade and Ray Allen in the playoffs this time around? Can Garnett organize the newly imported pieces into a coherent defensive unit capable of stretching to rotate, contest and cover Miami's quick/small/spread looks? Can Pierce, who shot just 34.4 percent from the field in the Eastern Conference finals, do enough against LeBron James and the Heat defense to give the C's a puncher's chance offensively? If he can't, is Rondo ready to take over the mantle of primary scoring option? If so, can he do it often enough to win four times in seven games? Answers to these questions won't come any time soon, but we're betting Celtics fans are going to think about them plenty between now and summertime.

Eric Freeman's Identity Crisis


There is no more important asset for a basketball team than talent, and yet the more loaded squad does not always win. What we've seen in recent seasons isn't only that the best team wins, but that the group with the clearest sense of self, from management down through the players, prevails. A team must not only be talented, but sure of its goals, present and future, and the best methods of obtaining them. Most NBA teams have trouble with their identity. Eric Freeman's Identity Crisis is a window into those struggles, the accomplishment of realizing a coherent identity, and the pitfalls of believing these issues to be solved.

The Big Three is dead, but that conception of the Celtics had been irrelevant for as little as one season, possibly nearly three, depending on whom you ask. Since their title in 2008, the Celtics have become more and more dependent on Rajon Rondo to control the office, relying on his creativity for shots and letting Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen function more as shooters than ball-controlling scorers. Though KG still controls the defense (and remains excellent in that role), this is Rondo's team.

The Big Three stood as a monument to veteran know-how and hard-won wisdom. Rondo, by contrast, presents a much less conservative sort of stardom: he occasionally seems fearful of shooting, his passes defy logic, he doesn't always get along with teammates, etc. Historically, that makes him a tough player to build around, and it's still an open question as to whether that approach will work when Garnett and Pierce are no longer on the roster. There's an essential uncertainty to what Rondo does, both in the apparent reasoning behind his more curious decisions and the idea that he might only be able to succeed in a very specific kind of team.

But turning Rondo into a central figure also changes the Celtics for the better, and not just because he's coming into his own as a star. With the Big Three, the Celtics were the sort of team that others fought to supplant, even when their record indicated they were not the best team in the East. Their value was part and parcel of the NBA establishment, an example for upstarts to measure themselves against. And while this incarnation of the team is still relatively old, all things considered, Rondo's ascendancy changes their identity into that of the dangerous challenger. They are still identifiably good, but they're less a milestone on the path to a conference title than a predator that might attack with little warning.

That's not to say that the Celtics are an unknown — no one will overlook them or forget they're a postseason contender. But an identity focused around Rondo is necessarily protean and difficult to pin down, which in turn makes the entire team a trickier challenge. A lack of predictability can be asset, especially for a team that's necessarily had to overhaul much of their rotation. Suddenly, the familiar has become strange. Keep pace if you can.

Tags: , , , Doc, , , , , rajon rondo, Rivers,
No Comments Share Read More

Multimedia: Week 7 Top Pickups

16 Oct
2012
Chris Wesseling breaks down the best players who still might be available in your league heading into Week 7.
No Comments Share Read More
1 2 3 4 5 40 41 Next »

Recent Posts

  • Matchups: Matchup: Lions @ Bears
    Matchups: Matchup: Lions @ Bears...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Tour Report: CIMB investing in Malaysian junior golf (PGA Tour)
    Tour Report: CIMB investing in Malaysian...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Baseball Daily Dose: Giant Performance
    Baseball Daily Dose: Giant Performance...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Matt Cain meets the ‘MythBusters’ crew (Video)
    Matt Cain meets the ‘MythBusters’ cr...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Pandahandler! Person in Pablo Sandoval suit by AT&T Park passively asks Giants fans for money (Photo)
    Pandahandler! Person in Pablo Sandoval s...
    October 22, 2012No Comments