Edmonton Oilers owner Daryl Katz gave an interview to the Edmonton Journal regarding his quest for a publicly funded new arena, and the transcript is as convoluted as hearing my buddy and I argue whether an X-Wing could defeat a Battlestar Galactica Viper in a dogfight. (The answer, of course, is the X-Wing; even if the targeting computer fails, Obi-Wan can guide your weapons system.)

But there were a few interesting moments among the political blather and imprudent threats — like the concept of Edmonton being "one of the smallest of small markets," as Katz put it.

From an outside Alberta perspective, that seems possible. The team's financial problems in the past left a stench of uncertainty.  We hear the small market harangue every summer during the free agent frenzy, as the Oilers overpay to attract talent.

But is Edmonton really a small market team in today's NHL?

Here's David Staples quizzing Katz:

DS: … what would you say first to the size of the Edmonton market right now, the size of the Edmonton market going forward, and this notion you should be doing more to build this privately as we saw Toronto, Ottawa, Vancouver.

DK: Well, No. 1, I can tell you the way we look at the markets. Markets are determined by the size of their media market. The size of the media market determines TV revenue, advertising and sponsorship revenue. Edmonton and Winnipeg are tied for the smallest markets in the league. That significantly affects revenue and the ability to grow. So I don't know where you're getting your numbers, but we in the league don't look at it that way.

Later, on tickets:

DS: Does not Edmonton, though, have a larger base of people who are willing to pay top dollar for NHL tickets and does that not also something (that's used for) a formulation of how big the market is?

DK: No, it doesn't. Edmonton could be viewed as a very loyal hockey market but you have to also understand we have the lowest corporate season-ticket base in the National Hockey League. We have more of an individual season-ticket base when you look at every other team in the league. That's something that's a challenge for the Oilers. To be frank, that's something that the Calgary Flames, for instance, don't have. They have a very big corporate base.

Forbes rates the Oilers at No. 15 in its latest team valuations, worth $212 million (US). Gate receipts were listed at $53 million from the previous season, with player costs at $55 million. Overall revenue has grown for the last three years, including a jump from $87 million to $96 million in the last two seasons.

For perspective, that $96 million in revenue puts them in the range with the San Jose Sharks ($96M) and the Minnesota Wild ($97M) and ahead of the Washington Capitals ($94M) — none of whom are usually listed about the League's small market teams (at least not in the last few seasons).

Jonathan Willis of Oilers Nation has long argued that the Oilers are not, in fact, playing in a small market now, and that the definition is for political purposes:

The Oilers are a big-market team. The Edmonton Oilers are the seventh-most expensive team to watch in the entire NHL (warning: PDF). Despite this, and despite being a terrible hockey team, they sell out every night. How many markets in the league would support that? It doesn't matter how many people live in the city, or what the size of the potential television market is, or any of the rest of it: all that matters is the number of people willing to pay to watch hockey. It's higher in Edmonton than it is in the majority of NHL markets; ergo, the club is a big-market team.

It is in the Oilers' interest to appear to be a small-market club. The Edmonton Oilers are negotiating with the city for support in building a new arena. Naturally, the city wants to hang on to NHL hockey; it's easier for the Oilers to extract money if the perception is that there's some danger in relocating. Obviously, there's an incentive for the team's ownership to play up that risk. Of course, as we've just pointed out, a team that sells out the building despite prices well above average and a club well below average is pretty much a dream scenario for an NHL owner.

Agreed -- Edmonton's small market be definition, but not in actual revenue generated.

The full Katz transcript is here. Give it a read and try to figure out how an owner who claims the team doesn't have an ounce of the corporate support that teams like the Flames have will suddenly fill pretty new suites in his arena.

Oh, but what an arena

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
• Yunel Escobar's eye black contained gay slur
• Tony Eury Jr., Danica Patrick's crew chief, now out at JR Motorsports
• Drake says John Calipari inspired him to finish high school
• Y! News: high school sweethearts reunite, marry the next day

No Comments Share Read More

Matt Doherty defends Julius Peppers, pokes fun at rival NC State

21 Aug
2012

Apparently tired of the gratuitous shots rival fans have taken at former North Carolina two-sport star Julius Peppers after the accidental release of his transcript last week, ex-Tar Heels player and coach Matt Doherty has fired back.

Doherty, who coached Peppers during the 2000-01 season, called the NFL defensive end "one of the smartest players I ever coached" on Twitter and noted that "doing poorly in school doesn't mean you are dumb." Then when an NC State supporter said that just meant Doherty had coached a lot of dumb players, the former North Carolina coach responded with some rivalry smack talk of his own.

Some will probably say it's unbecoming of a former head coach to stoop to bantering with rival fans, but personally I found it hilarious. It's refreshing to see an ex-player and head coach care deeply about his school and have a sense of humor about defending it.

At the same time, Doherty's comments about Peppers are a bit more disconcerting. It's great that he is taking the time to defend a former player whose academic woes have been wrongfully made public, but the message Doherty is sending is not one colleges will likely embrace.

Doherty implies that it's fine Peppers dropped out because believe he did it "to get into a business called the NFL." Fair enough, no argument here. But that's not the right message for the vast majority of players who don't have Peppers' talent and need a college diploma to fall back on in case football or basketball does not work out.

(Thanks, Eye on College Basketball)

Tags: , , , Julius Peppers, Matt Doherty, NC State, , , , Peppers, ,
No Comments Share Read More

Recent Posts

  • Matchups: Matchup: Lions @ Bears
    Matchups: Matchup: Lions @ Bears...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Tour Report: CIMB investing in Malaysian junior golf (PGA Tour)
    Tour Report: CIMB investing in Malaysian...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Baseball Daily Dose: Giant Performance
    Baseball Daily Dose: Giant Performance...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Matt Cain meets the ‘MythBusters’ crew (Video)
    Matt Cain meets the ‘MythBusters’ cr...
    October 22, 2012No Comments
  • Pandahandler! Person in Pablo Sandoval suit by AT&T Park passively asks Giants fans for money (Photo)
    Pandahandler! Person in Pablo Sandoval s...
    October 22, 2012No Comments